Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#72659 06/13/02 11:25 AM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1
I
stranger
OP Offline
stranger
I
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1
Hi there. Does anyone know if there is a gender-neutral term for "gentleman" as in "a gentleman's game"?

Thanks a zil,
Mel


#72660 06/13/02 04:06 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 39
R
newbie
Offline
newbie
R
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 39
I don't know what you would say except "gentleperson's" game, and I don't like that! I always cringe when I read something like "peoplekind" or whatever politically correct terms are used to avoid using the word "man". Can I even say "human" without being frowned upon? Maybe its because I'm a man, but I think this kind of language change is almost as ridiculous as the "neutering" of literature that is being discussed over in the "Danger to the written word" thread. (Not that the discussion is ridiculous by any means, just the politically-correct-gone-amuck changes to literature.) I'm curious. How many of you feel that the effort to remove gender from our language is getting ridiculous?

I probably should know better than to post this potentially divisive question right now...but here it is. You can practice your ignoring if you want!

Robert

Edit: Woops! I didn't see the PC thread before I posted this!


#72661 06/13/02 07:26 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,439
W
wow Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,439
gender-neutral term ... as in "a gentleman's game"?

Not really needed is it? A gentleman's game - to me - a game only gentlemen (read rich) men can afford to indulge in. Like Polo or maybe Horse Racing (where you own the horse!)

Let's see would a woman's game be -- having baby? or if that's too heavy -- synchronized balletic swimming.


#72662 06/14/02 02:19 AM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 320
S
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
S
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 320
I've had a hunch for a while that the term gentleman is showing signs of disappearing from the language. Notice that in most public places the doors to rest rooms (that's toilets for those not prone to euphemism) are generally labeled ladies and men. The bloviating blowhards in our legislative bodies still persist in addressing one another as "the honorable gentleman from -----" and I'm not getting into the honorable part here and even refer to female colleagues as "gentlewomen." It all comes off as phony-baloney. In fact, the terms ladies and gentlemen, men and women, boys and girls haven't been used as consistent pairs for quite some time. Scott Fitzgerald wrote about men and girls at parties, and to call a group of grown-up females girls or gals is a sure way to ruffle feathers, while males don't seem to mind being called boys or guys. We seem to have more gender terms than we need in English.


#72663 06/14/02 02:56 AM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 275
W
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
W
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 275
How many of you feel that the effort to remove gender from our language is getting ridiculous?

Where do people find the time to waste on this ridiculous pursuit?


#72664 06/14/02 03:19 AM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 833
M
old hand
Offline
old hand
M
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 833
I don't know about a gender-neutral term for "gentlemen's game" so I'm responding to Robert's post about the neutering of the language.

I despise it.

Perhaps it does fit in well with the PC discussion going on in another thread.....I have to say I blithely use whatever gender seems most appropriate at the time! For example, if I have a passenger in my car (a relatively rare event), I like to open the door for him/her first, before I open my own; so I always say, "I'm such a gentleman," just in case they hadn't noticed how gentlemanly my behaviour was....! Then again, I'm the lass who appreciates it when a man opens a door for her, or walks on the outside of the sidewalk when walking with her. That kind o' thing. Well - it comes down to nice manners, don't it? Manners maketh man.

I once wrote a humorous piece for the local paper about gender-neutral language and how it was emasculating English. I had a fine ol' time with it, doing things like suggesting that we had better have two kinds of thick dark table syrup, moladdies as well as molasses, in case any Scots were offended....It was a little insane (as you may have guessed from the example I gave!) but I think people enjoyed it!

In church, where I hadn't been for years but recently started going sporadically again, I find myself out of step with the times: I always want to stick the word "man" into the liturgy where I learned it and where it used to be, and usually wind up saying it all by myself!

eg: Who for us men, and for our salvation, came down from Heaven

Whoops. But one of the elderly ladies my mother and I sit with says she likes to say "man" where it used to be, too, so I'm not really alone.


#72665 06/14/02 10:25 AM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3
P
stranger
Offline
stranger
P
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3
Or like G.O.L.F. -- Gentlemen Only Ladies Forbidden



(grandpa)
#72666 06/14/02 10:48 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
F
veteran
Offline
veteran
F
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
Gentlemen Only Ladies Forbidden

'Fraid not Paul, fun as it is!
http://wordsmith.org/board/showthreaded.pl?Cat=&Board=words&Number=71488

Golf is fairly often classed "a gentleman's game", though, at least by Brits.

Fisk


#72667 06/14/02 11:35 AM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 688
A
addict
Offline
addict
A
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 688
I once wrote a humorous piece for the local paper about gender-neutral language and how it was emasculating English.

Sounds like an appropriate piece for this thread modgod. Would there be a link to it? And I assume it would be too long to post here. Any ideas? Would love to see it.


#72668 06/14/02 01:36 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
F
veteran
Offline
veteran
F
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
a game only gentlemen (read rich) men can afford to indulge in

Hiya Wise One!

Disagree with you here, I think, although I am going by British (and maybe more specifically English) definitions.
A gentleman isn't necessarily a rich man. It's all about manners, integrity and honour. Oh, and ideals, of course .

You'd call someone a "real gent[leman]" on account of the respect they accord to those they meet (especially to supposed inferiors). You'd also take note of how well they keep their word, as a gentleman is impeccably trustworthy. An unwritten "gentleman's agreement" could stand in place of a binding legal contract. Honour is at stake so there will be no reneging on the agreement. A "gentleman's bet" is a particular type of gentleman's agreement (similarly no third parties required), with an occasional extra variant on standard bets that little or no money is at stake.

A gentleman's game, therefore, is as much - if not more - a type of game than a game played by a particular group of people (or a particular gender). It's a game that by its nature makes fixing, cheating and underhand dealing difficult if not impossible.
Probably the truth is that there is no gentleman's game by this definition, but a favourite candidate locally would be cricket. Not my game, but there you have it. Golf would probably come close. Horse racing and football (meaning soccer) would once have come fairly high up the list, but probably not so much these days .

In fact, being a gentleman isn't valued as highly as once was, probably because of mistaken association with high incomes and/or privileged family backgrounds. Baby thrown out with the bath-water a bit, IMHO.

As to gender, the female equivalent of gentlemen is, of course, "ladies" rather than "gentlewomen". I believe the implicit assumption is that ladies are never anything but genteel, i.e. they would always be polite and fair, and can always be trusted to keep their word.
And who are we to argue with our forebears?

Once upon a time it would, I think, have been considered derogatory to refer to a man as simply "the man" rather than "the gentleman". But it definitely wouldn't have been right to refer to "the woman" rather than "the lady". In many circles the latter rule still applies to some extent, which is fine by me.

Oh, thanks imanishimel for a thread that got me thinking, and that I found related to a subject surprisingly close to my heart!

Fisk


Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,316
Members9,182
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Ineffable, ddrinnan, TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV
9,182 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 342 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
tsuwm 10,542
wofahulicodoc 10,533
LukeJavan8 9,916
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5