|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,692
Pooh-Bah
|
OP
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,692 |
I have become curious as to the origin of these terms when used to describe socialist or conservative politics.
It occurred to me that it might originate from the positions of the two parties in Parliament, but research shows that in the UK at least the party in power sits on the right of the Speaker and the major opposition sits on the left.
Please can any political history buff provide the answer?
Come to think of it, why is left wing red and right wing blue?
dxb
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,757
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,757 |
It stems from the lay out of the parties in the Jacobin chamber, which was somewhat circular in shape compared to thetypical UK (and derivative) oppositional style. It's a classic case of a particular attribute getting attached to and then redefining the word used to identify the subject!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 170
member
|
member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 170 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,094
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,094 |
It stems from the lay out of the parties in the Jacobin chamber
It's that way in the US Congress as well. The Dems sit on the left (facing the speaker) and the Reps on the right. (I wonder where Jim Jeffords sits.)
Does anyone know when the US developed this custom? I wouldn't think that the early Congress would have copied what the Brits were doing, seeing as the new nation was trying to be completely different.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 544
addict
|
addict
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 544 |
I'll be out of pocket this afternoon, but I have my pager
SilkMuse - thanks for your clear definition of the correct use of "out of pocket" - its misuse drives me mad.
I occasionally work with a group of people in an office in Dallas who all, each and every one of them, use this phrase in the incorrect sense you describe - even going so far as to change their voice-mail messages to say they're "out of pocket" when they're away from the office for a few days. They happen to be a fairly rigidly hierarchical organization, and I have assumed that, when in the office, the staff-people I work with feel that they are in the manager's pockets. Thus, when they get to escape from that by travelling or going to meetings outside the office, they are in fact "out of pocket." But it's still wrong, in my book.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,511
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,511 |
I thought left wing and right wing came from the French? Good question on the red and blue, dxb. It's that way in the US, too. Maybe red comes from Communism? and blue to be as distinct as possible from red? In other words, I have no clue and am merely "voicing" vague ideas from my junk-drawer memory®. Can anyone with time/inclination look these up? Dr Bill, where are you??
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 322
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 322 |
Wow - I've never heard 'out of pocket' (mis)used like that. It sounds really funny to me. I can hardly imagine how/why that started (unless Hyla's assumption is right). Very interesting.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803 |
can hardly imagine how/why that started
Perhaps the usage developed when one is on one's own financially rather than on expense account or using a company credit card, for example, if on vacation all expenses are one's own and one is "out of pocket".
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542 |
word detective: Pocketapocketapocketa.
Dear Word Detective: I am having an argument with my brother. He insists that the phrase "out of pocket" refers to expenditure from one's own resources, with the expectation of later reimbursement. I contend that one is "out of pocket" when one cannot be reached, is outside of the place where one can contact or be contacted. He has found a legal brief to support his position and I want something from another expert that challenges his brief. -- Dr. Nancy Tarsi, via the internet.
You know, I'm not entirely sure I want to get involved in this argument if you folks are already waving legal briefs at each other. Am I going to have to testify in court? I should warn you that I grew up watching the old Perry Mason TV series, and the moment I land in the witness box I'm likely to break down and confess to all sorts of shocking, if somewhat irrelevant, transgressions.
I'm especially apprehensive about answering your question because I'm afraid that your brother's case is very strong. "Out of pocket" is indeed usually used as a sort of shorthand for "paying out of one's own pocket that which should (and usually ultimately will) be paid by someone else." Interestingly, the original sense of "out of pocket" when it first appeared around 1693 was not so hopeful. It meant to be either "broke" or "the loser in a financial transaction."
However, and here's where your case gains strength, around 1974 "out of pocket" also started being used to mean "out of touch" or "unavailable." No one seems to know exactly why this sense arose or what the "pocket" in this case might be. Personally, I suspect that it's a bad translation of some French phrase. In any case, this sense of "out of pocket" is not, as far as I can tell, widely used. A more common phrase meaning the same thing is "out of the loop," which first appeared around 1983 and is probably rooted in computer terminology.
But the bottom line is that you're both right, although your brother is a bit more likely to be clearly understood when he uses "out of pocket." word mavens: (this mentions that it has been discussed at alt.usage.english) http://www.randomhouse.com/wotd/index.pperl?date=20010522()
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542 |
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,316
Members9,182
|
Most Online3,341 Dec 9th, 2011
|
|
1 members (wofahulicodoc),
604
guests, and
2
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|