Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
Posted for discussion on eMule Poetry Archives:

"Philip Wheelwright's 1962 classification of metaphors into "epiphors"
(metaphors that express the existence of something) and "diaphors"
(metaphors that imply the possibility of something). Diaphor and epiphor
measure the likeness and the dissimilarity of the attributes of the
referents. A diaphor can become an epiphor (when the object is found to
really exist) and an epiphor can become a literal expression (when the term
has been used for so long that people have forgotten its origin). "

http://www.compapp.dcu.ie/~tonyv/trinity/maccormac.html

Examples of each, anyone? Tsuwm?



Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
sure.

epiphor: time flows like a river.

diaphor: “Life... is a woman on her back, with swollen, close-set breasts, a smooth, soft, fat belly between protruding hips, with slender arms, plump thighs, and half-closed eyes, who in her grandiose and taunting provocation demands our most ardent fervour” [George Perec, Life A User’s Manual]


Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,204
R
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
R
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,204
Why is it that I never meet diaphors like that . . . .?


Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,379
I
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
I
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,379
<< time flows like a river.>>

or, rather, "the river of time"?


Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
W
wwh Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
Earl MacCormac



If we accept that literal truth, falsity and figurality form a continuum rather than a discrete set, then this entails a
clear violation of the law of the excluded middle, should ever a logical analysis of metaphor be pursued. Such a
fuzzy-logical approach has been formalised by Earl MacCormac (1985), in a four-valued logic which not only
accommodates truth and falsity, but, following Wheelwright (1962), also embraces metaphor in two forms,
Epiphor and Diaphor. A diaphor is a novel metaphor which strikes a discordant note, evoking emotive tension in
the listener; diaphors initially suggest more dissimilarities that commonalties between the tenor and vehicle,
which may have to be reconciled by a change of representation (see Indurkhya 1992). Epiphors are
conventionalised or comparison-centred metaphors which have lost their emotive force and which no longer
challenge existing conceptual representations.

Employing a system of fuzzy semantic markers, MacCormac defines the fuzzy membership of one category in
another as a real number ranging from zero (absolute falsehood) to one (undeniable truth). Within this range
exist the delimiters a, b, c, such that 0 > a < b < c < 1, where the interval 0 to a represents falsehood, a to b
represents diaphor, b to c represents epiphor, and c to 1 represents literal truth. Metaphoric set membership is
thus indicated by a value in the range a to c. Novel metaphors begin life as diaphors, and migrate along this fuzzy
scale into epiphors as they lose their emotive tension through commonplace use, to eventually find rest as dead
metaphors in the literal truth interval. MacCormac argues for the necessity of literal truth in this model, though
it is hard to view it here as anything but a carry-over from previous marker schemes, where an attempt is made to
impose an a priori division between semantic validity and anomaly. As we have seen, such a division makes no
allowance for contextual influence and is thus incapable of an adequate treatment of metaphor. Given the correct
poetic setting, even hoary old anomalies such as `Colourless green ideas dream furiously' can be granted a
valid interpretation. What distinguishes diaphor from anomaly is the existence of a context which supports a
metaphoric reading, not an artificial delimiter on a fuzzy scale.

While the distinction between truth, anomaly and metaphor is artificial, so too is the distinction between epiphor
and diaphor. These forms of metaphor most likely require different forms of processing (if the distinction is to
be worth making at all), such that passing the fixed threshold (b) on the fuzzy scale will result in a radical
reappraisal of content. But this sudden discontinuity of interpretation contradicts the continuous nature of the
underlying fuzzy system. By way of analogy, consider a car which is driving down the motorway, gradually
accelerating as it goes. As the car passes 55 m.p.h. the driver is suddenly classified as a speeder. This somewhat
arbitrary, imposed discontinuity serves a useful classification task in allowing the police to recognise
potentially dangerous drivers. However, it reveals nothing about the mechanics of the engine powering the car,
which doesn't perform in a qualitatively different manner after the speed limit is surpassed. Neither does a
second engine kick in above certain speeds. In this sense MacCormac's model makes good a posteriori
philosophy but comes up short as a cognitive model. A more realistic model which preserves continuity is one
in which metaphors are processed homogeneously, and the epiphor/diaphor distinction is used to measure the
quantity of processing performed.

http://www.thymos.com/mind/m.html A very similar discussion.
http://www.birdhouse.org/words/baald/metaphor.html


Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 218
B
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
B
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 218
And what one person feels is a very discordant diaphor, another more keen, perceptive, or knowledgeable person may feel it a trite and overly-obvious epiphor.


Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
Some more interesting discussion from the eMule site:

Below is a quote (again from Dennis Hammes) that expands
and clarifies the issues:

Wheelwright, Philip. Metaphor and Reality. Bloomington, IN:
Indiana University Press; 1962.
...may have the best discussion. It was Aristotle who made the
distinction in the /Ars Poetica/. Both of them use definitions based on the
logic and mechanics of language. The distinction you give above is a /much/
better working distinction.

Epiphor is what we now mean by "metaphor." Its vehicle is a
specific and proper subset of the tenor, in at least most examples;
depending on how closely and broadly the known mechanisms of the vehicle map
those of the tenor, it can become extended metaphor or symbol (it's still
ephiphor); simile is epiphor in which the vehicle has only one attribute in
common with the tenor (the flag words "like" or "as" are /not/ andatory or
distinguishing), and so cannot be extended.
Diaphor hunts for or asserts a connection between two things whose
mechanism(s) is(are) not known well enough to make any subsequent estimate
of the comparison; it is commonly said to be "mere," even "accidental"
juxtaposition, but it isn't; the poet has seen/felt /a/ connection, but is
unable to dwell on what it is. The abuse of this technique in a putative
report (the poem) is simply to slap pretties or shockers together
essentially at random to watch the sparks.

A working poet will probably spend most of his time trying to turn diaphor
into epiphor (and not necessarily with his pencil in hand), as the latter
obviously maps (explains) the universe of an observation better. Haiku so
/look/ like diaphor that it is often necessary to dwell on them for some
time to discover just what epiphor the poet has attempted, and how it works
(that is, if he wasn't just banging rocks together).

The above was taken from a thread on the newsgroup
alt.arts.poetry.comments - you can read the whole thread on Google (was
Deja) Groups ,
searching for the thread Ripe for the Wind.

I wouldn't think 'War is hell' would fit, but perhaps something
like 'War is a yellow ribbon', where the connection is not clear.

(Edit: Thanks for the links, wow! And the newsgroup url was provided but the other board deleted it...I haven't arrived at newsgroups yet, so if anyone goes and has the url please post it for others. Thanks!)


Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
W
wwh Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
RC says:"Why is it that I never meet diaphors like that . . . .?" Diaphors like the one tsuwm gave cause me to experience diaphoresis.Though not so much as it would have sixty years ago.


Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
W
wwh Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
Hear ye, Hear ye. Proof positive that companionship is beneficial. Good old Faldage, instead of crucifying me before you all, is now so mellow that he sent me a PM exposing my failure to detect an error in the mathematical expression in the long post above"

0 > a < b < c < 1 Obviously, now that Faldage has pointed it out, 0 should be less than a, not greater than a : the expression should read: 0<a<b<c<1 The way the pointed end points does make a difference.


Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,757
M
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
M
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,757
The way the pointed end points does make a difference.

Yep, that's what I like to hear from *my doctors too... [worried]


Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,912
Posts229,283
Members9,179
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV, Heather_Turey, Standy
9,179 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 302 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
tsuwm 10,542
wofahulicodoc 10,510
LukeJavan8 9,916
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5