Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 6 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
#36678 07/30/01 08:02 PM
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,094
J
old hand
Offline
old hand
J
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,094
W is the thief

Ok, time for the defense to step in.

I know we've already discussed this, but I'm sick of you all calling it a stolen election. The disgustingly arbitrary vote counting supported by the Gore camp is simply not legitimate. There were no standards. The Supreme Court just stopped the unorganized tabulation of votes. Plus, after the election was all said and done the media finished counting the votes and guess who came up the winner: Bush. So drop it already.

Helen, it's also absurd to say that because Bush was elected the US economy is going to suffer. Had Gore been elected taxes would have surely been raised, and can you please explain how in the world taking money from hard-working people is going to help the economy? The government spends too much money on frivolous programs and gives too much to people who don't know anything about saving it or spending it wisely. Tanzania receives more welfare from the US than any other nation, they've been receiving it for 30 years, and they're still the 3rd poorest nation in the world. Welfare doesn't work, let people spend it how they want and the economy improves. Why do you think America had the highest standard of living in the world in the first half of the 20th century when taxes were very low, and now we don't when taxes are much higher?

And while I'm on my soapbox, and this post is already pretty long, I'm going to finally make my riposte about the whole global warming issue. Simply, there's no way you can prove that industry is causing any weather changes when we've only been recording weather conditions for 140 years. The truth is that CO2 and other gas emissions have gone down greatly in the last 50 years because cars and factories are cleaner. The UN should concentrate on people who are actively destroying nature rather than stifling business by going after companies that are emitting harmless gases. There is simply no proof that global warming is linked to human actions. Records even show that the global temperature has actually gone down in the last 30 or so years.

And BY, don't say I'm brainwashed. I'm not. In America the government doesn't control what's printed or put on TV. My dad, a research scientist, subscribes to a magazine called "The Scientist" which is the opinions of the most reputed scientists in America, and they agree with the positions I've just stated, and you can't say that they're brainwashed. The US has bar-none the best research universities in the world and they do their research freely.

There was a program on ABC about a month ago called "Tampering With Nature" that exposed the fallacious claims of people who attribute global warming to humans. He even showed school children being brainwashed by their teachers to that effect. Many environmentalist groups tryed to stop the show from running because they knew that the scientists were right: Global warming is not caused by humans.

Excuse my ranting, but I can't stand claims that have no proof.


#36679 07/30/01 09:07 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
W
wwh Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
Dear Jazz: I agree with you that climate change is not due entirely to human activity. But given the very disagreable effects global warming may well cause, carefully planned efforts to reduce CO2 and methane emissions seem like good sense. The operative phrase is carefully planned. There has been a lot of nonsense such as government grants for efforts to reduce cow flatus. Keeping cows' intestinal flora optimal for low flaturulence would require an unreasonable amount of labwork and treatment. And if it comes to that, I find it hard to believe that total human flatus does not greatly exceed cow flatus. Who wants the job of controlling the human output?


Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
Actually, I think all discussion of politics, especially "major party" politics in the US, is a moot point. All interests are controlled by the same cartel of the big-monied power elite who manipulate everything for their own greed...that's the current "government." So what I'm afraid we're settling in for here, in the long run, is really the
Bush/Clinton/Bush/Clinton/Bush "Administration"...same folks behind them. Oh, in case you're wondering, that's George/Bill/George/Hillary/Jeb. (Neil Bush blew his eligibility for the job with the Silverado S and L Banking Scandal...that's why Dubya's there now).


#36681 07/31/01 10:21 AM
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 609
R
addict
Offline
addict
R
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 609
Jazz,
I am very glad that you are taking a serious interest in the subject of global warming, and I am equally glad that we both live in countries that allow us to hold and debate opposing views. However, this is not the forum to hold a major discussion on the subject, so I will restrain myself. I will send a PM however if I may.
Rod


#36682 07/31/01 10:41 AM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,156
B
old hand
Offline
old hand
B
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,156
In America the government doesn't control what's printed or put on TV.

No, but the conservative mega-corporations which control the media do!

Records even show that the global temperature has actually gone down in the last 30 or so years.

There's a plot outside my office which shows the opposite. There was a slight drop through the 1970's, but between 1980 and 2000 the trend is definitely upward. It also appeared to be higher than average between about 1935 and 1970, and lower than average before that (see http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/ol/climate/research/1998/anomalies/anomalies.html and click on the graph).

there's no way you can prove that industry is causing any weather changes when we've only been recording weather conditions for 140 years.

No, you can't prove it, but you can come up with good models, test their predictions, discuss your findings with other scientists...waiting to see if it's really us who are causing the global warming will leave it until it's too late to fix!

"The Scientist"

You'll have to read a lot more than just one magazine if you want to convince yourself if something is true or not. Just because some more outspoken scientists have decided to state that we are not causing global warming, doesn't mean that their views are the only ones that matter. You have to consider the work and findings of many people, on both sides of the argument, before you can come to a conclusion.

I can't stand claims that have no proof.

Just be careful, by your arguments, you have no proof the other way, either!

By the way, I too had done some reading which indicated that global warming was a bit of an exaggeration, and was originally inclined to agree. Then I took a graduate course in ocean circulation modeling, in which we also talked about global warming, and I have since come around to the "we'd better be careful" side. The evidence for seems to be better than that against.


#36683 07/31/01 11:13 AM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,511
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,511

In America the government doesn't control what's printed or put on TV.

No, but the conservative mega-corporations which control the media do!


The only conservative mega-media-corporation I'm aware of is Fox. And it's fiercely outnumbered, without even mentioning CBC or PBS.

~~~~
and yes, rodward, I agree. This is not the forum for politics.


#36684 07/31/01 02:52 PM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
>This is not the forum for politics.

sure, get your shot in and then affect a salutary position.<harrumph>


#36685 07/31/01 03:34 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,661
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,661
WO'N - As PM'd, I was gonna speak, but yet again, Bean has made my point (singular) for me...

...affect a salutary position... Now we're talkin'...

Cheers


#36686 08/01/01 02:42 AM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
In America the government doesn't control what's printed or put on the TV

No, but the conservative mega-corporations which control the media do!

The only conservative mega-media-corporation I'm aware of is FOX

The owner of FOX News, and countless newspapers nationwide, and a movie studio, etc., etc., etc....is a self-proclaimed far-right wacko, Rupert Murdoch...an Aussie! Consolidating his influence and control of the media....for what? Beware.....



#36687 08/01/01 12:24 PM
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,094
J
old hand
Offline
old hand
J
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,094
is a self-proclaimed far-right wacko

Yes, but news anchors are notoriously very liberal.


Page 6 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,318
Members9,182
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Ineffable, ddrinnan, TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV
9,182 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 749 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
tsuwm 10,542
wofahulicodoc 10,535
LukeJavan8 9,916
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5