|About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us|
You are not logged in. [Log In] Wordsmith.org » Forums » General Topics » Q&A about words » words within words Register User Forum List Calendar Active Topics Search FAQ
#34273 - 06/30/01 05:14 PM Re: words within words
Loc: Rio Grande, Cape May County, N...
But after the discussion about over use of the quotation marks...?
Good to know someone else is going through the same Quotation Mark Paranoia that I'm experiencing right now! Notice all the bold showing up in my posts lately?
#34274 - 06/30/01 08:09 PM Re: words within words
Loc: Alice Springs, Northern Territ...
In reply to:
longest charlinkade FORESTALL: FOREST, ALL; FORE, REST, TALL (9)
notice the "link" part of charlinkade. the words listed in the two groups *link the characters of forestall. the word ore is also contained therein, but doesn't work.
In the word 'therein' there nests a veritable forest of linguistic creatures. And 'therein' itself nests in 'thereinbefore', an even more fertile progenitor of nested words.
As for agglutinative or pyramid or curtailed words, the longest string I've seen started with about 13 letters, but my favourite (only because I thought it up myself), at 11, is:
An austringer, as I'm sure you all know, is a variant spelling (in OED) of the word for 'a keeper of goshawks'.
#34275 - 07/01/01 04:46 AM Re: words within words
You will remember "separate" if you remember not the rat in it, but a rat in it.
My mistake, wow and sparteye
It's pretty clear to me now what you meant!
#34276 - 07/01/01 10:20 AM Re: words within words & pesky "spells"
Loc: New England, USA
not, dear Marianna, it's the lack of vocal intonation in the written word that causes difficulties now and then ... happens to all of us.
Here's another I had trouble with early on in spelling lessons : remember that cemetery is all "E"s - as in EEEEEE! A cemetery!
And Sheriff was a problem until someone said : "The Sheriff is a Really Fine Fellow!" -- Sheriff : one R, two Fs.
#34277 - 07/01/01 10:59 PM Re: words within words
In reply to:
the "study" of words within words
Then there's infixes. In English I think they're mainly confined to swear words (absobloodylutely)but I believe there are languages where they're used just as much as we use prefixes and suffixes.
#34278 - 07/02/01 08:00 AM Re: words within words
Dear Bingley: thanks for the word "infix". I don't remember seeing it before, and it could be handy.My dictionary gives the word "gemology" with the "o" as an infix.
P.S. All of the words ending in "ology" then are examples of use of "o" as an infix.
#34279 - 07/02/01 10:09 AM Re: words within words
Loc: this too shall pass
re: absobloodylutely - some resources now assign the rhetorical figure tmesis to this kind of affix.
#34280 - 07/02/01 10:13 AM Re: words within words
…infixes. In English I think they're mainly confined to swear words …
This is a whole nother issue.
#34281 - 07/02/01 10:19 AM Re: words within words
Loc: this too shall pass
a whole nother
...and *that is definitely tmesis.
#34282 - 07/02/01 10:30 AM Re: words within words
Tsuwm scores big again. Thanks for the link to the word "tmesis".
Forum Stats 8677 Members
Max Online: 3341 @ 12/09/11 02:15 PM
Newest Members grand2, Sunny Jim, Mercur10, LMD, mary bernard
8678 Registered Users
Who's Online 0 registered (), 51 Guests and 13 Spiders online. Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters (30 Days)
wofahulicodoc 71 LukeJavan8 59 endymion6 49 jenny jenny 25 Tromboniator 14 Faldage 8 Jackie 7 olly 5 GHCabrera 3 Taher_Kagalwala 2
March Su M Tu W Th F Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Board Rules · Mark all read Contact Us · Wordsmith.org · Top
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.
Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat
© 2014 Wordsmith