|About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us|
You are not logged in. [Log In] Wordsmith.org » Forums » General Topics » Q&A about words » Hyphenated adjectives revisited Register User Forum List Calendar Active Topics Search FAQ
#23119 - 03/16/01 12:45 PM Hyphenated adjectives revisited
Loc: Eastern Pennsylvania
While shopping at Home Depot with my parents the other day, I noticed a package that was printed in three languages. In part, it read:
Instrucciones fáciles de seguir/ Instructions faciles à suivre/ Easy-to-follow Instructions
So here's my question: Is English the only language in which hyphens are used to create adjectives?
I realize we've had similar discussions before (like the Hyphenated Modifiers from @#$% thread) but I don't recall talking about the language factor.
#23120 - 03/16/01 03:01 PM Re: Hyphenated adjectives revisited
Well, this only connects tangentially, but Germans are notorious for building formidable nouns as massive compound words, with no hyphens at all, like "geschwindigkeitsbegrenzung" for speed limit.
I think they may do the same thing with verbs, but alas, German 101 was a long time ago....gs
#23121 - 03/16/01 03:43 PM Re: Hyphenated adjectives revisited
Loc: lower upstate New York
Well, we get the ability to create adjectives out of nouns from our Germanic side. In the Romance languages, you can't do that. The illustration you cite above, Rapunzel, supposes that (i.e., "instructions that are easy to follow").
But I'll stop here and wait for our resident German experts to weigh in.
#23122 - 03/16/01 04:12 PM Re: Hyphenated adjectives revisited
Germanic vs. Romance adjective-making tendencies
As is well known, and has been mentioned, German makes use of the agglutinative method, which makes for some really monstrous outcomes, at least in our view. It has certainly been made fun of often enough by various comedians who have an intellectual audience. But the Romance language method, which mostly consists of spreading out the various qualities or concepts, can also make some monstrosities. You get these strings of xxxx de xxxxx de xxxxx de xxxx which are more annoying than anything else, at least to English speakers. French is the worst for this, being the language that has to say, "Qu'est-ce que c'est que cela?" for "What's that?"
English seems to take a sort of middle course between the two methods, which figures, since the language is a Germanic base fused with a bastard French dialect, with some Latin and Old Norse tossed in.
#23123 - 03/17/01 06:11 PM Re: Hyphenated adjectives revisited
C'est quoi ça? OR Qu’est-ce que c’est? = What’s that?
Qu'est-ce que c'est que cela? = What is that thing there?
#23124 - 03/17/01 07:54 PM Re: Hyphenated adjectives revisited
Loc: Northamptonshire, England
C'est quoi ça?
While not a great French scholar despite six years of it at school, I do remember being told that the above way of saying "What's that?" is peremptory or angry, like a mother pointing a mess made by a child.
Is this another myth I can throw on the pile of rubbish taught to me?_________________________
The idiot also known as Capfka ...
#23125 - 03/17/01 08:17 PM Re: Hyphenated adjectives revisited
Cap. I can't really speak for the French from France but here in Québec c'est quoi ça is the usual method of asking what's that. It is not peremptory or angry, but it is considered "common speak" that most highbrow teachers want to eliminate.
When we say qu'est-ce c'est it is just like saying "what is that" without the contraction of "what is" into what's. It is usually said when we are minding our Ps and Qs.
Forum Stats 8835 Members
Max Online: 3341 @ 12/09/11 02:15 PM
Newest Members JimHarbor, treponim, Esmith, EvanescentBlue, Ashley
8835 Registered Users
Who's Online 0 registered (), 16 Guests and 4 Spiders online. Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters (30 Days)
endymion6 81 wofahulicodoc 76 LukeJavan8 65 A C Bowden 44 May 1 tsuwm 1
wwh 13858 Faldage 13803 Jackie 11613 tsuwm 10530 LukeJavan8 7347 Buffalo Shrdlu 7210 AnnaStrophic 6511 Wordwind 6296 wofahulicodoc 5708 of troy 5400
Board Rules · Mark all read Contact Us · Wordsmith.org · Top
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.
Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat
© 2014 Wordsmith