|About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us|
You are not logged in. [Log In] Wordsmith.org » Forums » General Topics » Q&A about words » Kids/Children Register User Forum List Calendar Active Topics Search FAQ
Go to page...
#19054 - 02/21/01 12:42 PM Re: 1950s joke - late submission
Loc: New England, USA
Two elderly English gentlemen ensconced in the lounge of their club.
First Man : "I say, heard about Cholmondley?"
Other Man : "No. What's he doing?"
First Man : "In Africa. Living with an ape."
Other Man : "Male or female?"
First Man : "Female, of course!
He may be odd but he's not queer."
How Times do change.
#19055 - 02/21/01 02:00 PM Re: Queer as Folk
Queer as Folk is now the title of a TV show on a cable network in the US. The show is about homosexuals.
#19056 - 02/21/01 03:05 PM Re: 1950s joke - late submission
There was a young man from Dundee
Who had sex with an ape in a tree
The results were most horrid
All ass and no forehead
Six balls and a purple goatee. Date 1935
#19057 - 02/21/01 03:30 PM Re: Queer as Folk
I think it is shown here but I've not seen it.
#19058 - 02/21/01 05:32 PM Re: Queer as Folk
Loc: Cincinnati & Loveland, Ohio, U...
Queer as Folk
The US version of the cable channel Showtime is a spin-off of the Brit version that was on BBC 4, I think. The US version is set in Pittsburg (though it's filmed in Canada) and is considered to be the homosexual counterpart of HBO's Sex in the City
#19059 - 02/21/01 06:26 PM Re: Kids vs. children
Loc: Chicago, IL, USA
kids is not acceptable in formal contexts. This, just from a survey of common usage
I don't have any problem with "kids" usage (2 kids @ my house also), but I hope that Rugrats never moves from slang to daily use. Especially considering the nasty nature of those cartoon charactors.
#19060 - 02/21/01 07:42 PM Re: Kids vs. children
Rugs are stationary mops.
Kids are self-propelled mops.
#19061 - 02/22/01 09:34 AM Re: Kids vs. children
Loc: New England, USA
Being CJ wrote : kids is not acceptable in formal contexts. This, just from a survey of common usage
My feeling is that "children" has a connotation of well behaved whereas "kids" has a raucous note to it.
#19062 - 02/22/01 09:47 AM Re: Kids vs. children Anonymous
I generally refer to mine, collectively, as lilliputians, which i think is appropriate on myriad levels.
i switched to this term of endearment when my standard round-up call, "Come along, my little tax-deductions" gleaned some odd looks from strangers.
#19063 - 02/22/01 09:52 AM Re: Kids vs. children
Go to page...
Forum Stats 8738 Members
Max Online: 3341 @ 12/09/11 02:15 PM
Newest Members KatieC, ashishsum, ackcat, mayne, Yesurbius
8738 Registered Users
Who's Online 0 registered (), 31 Guests and 4 Spiders online. Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters (30 Days)
LukeJavan8 84 endymion6 82 wofahulicodoc 68 A C Bowden 39 May 4 Tromboniator 4 FoFong 3 LadyReader 2 KatieC 1 tsuwm 1
wwh 13858 Faldage 13803 Jackie 11609 tsuwm 10522 Buffalo Shrdlu 7210 AnnaStrophic 6511 LukeJavan8 6488 Wordwind 6296 of troy 5400 BranShea 5282
Board Rules · Mark all read Contact Us · Wordsmith.org · Top
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.
Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat
© 2014 Wordsmith