|About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us|
You are not logged in. [Log In] Wordsmith.org » Forums » General Topics » Miscellany » 'manned/unmanned' and gender neutralisation Register User Forum List Calendar Active Topics Search FAQ
#148338 - 09/26/05 05:49 AM 'manned/unmanned' and gender neutralisation
Since 'man' and 'men' have become exclusive, terms such as 'crewed/uncrewed' are being used to fill in the gap left by manned/unmanned, but it occurs to me that 'crewed' does not really work with, for example, an unmanned border post. What would AWADers suggest instead?
While we're at it, does anyone know of a 'definitive' list of alternatives to the common male-centric terminology?
#148339 - 09/26/05 05:54 AM Re: 'manned/unmanned' and gender neutralisation
I dunno. We'll probably need some input from the wopersons in the group.
#148340 - 09/26/05 07:57 AM Re: 'manned/unmanned' and gender neutralisation
Loc: rego park
well a border post exist for a reason--perhaps it is automated?
so rather than unmanned it is a automated (or automatic) border post? with electronic recording devices._________________________
my other obsession
#148341 - 09/26/05 08:11 AM Re: 'manned/unmanned' and gender neutralisation
> well a border post exist for a reason--perhaps it is automated?
Yeah, I know what you mean, but I was thinking more along the lines of this: 'The border post was unmanned at the time we crossed.'
I guess you could say, 'There were no border personnel at the post when we crossed', but that's changing things around quite a lot.
#148342 - 09/26/05 09:22 AM Re: 'manned/unmanned' and gender neutralisation
Loc: New York City
>>an unmanned border post<<
#148343 - 09/26/05 09:52 AM Re: 'manned/unmanned' and gender neutralisation
Come, civil night,
Thou sober-suited matron, all in black,
And learn me how to lose a winning match,
Played for a pair of stainless maidenhoods.
Hood my unmanned blood, bating in my cheeks,
With thy black mantle till strange love grow bold,
Think true love acted simple modesty.
Come, night; come, Romeo; come, thou day in night;
For thou wilt lie upon the wings of night
Whiter than new snow upon a raven's back.
Unmanned here means untamed. Nice usage of the verb to learn, too.
[While in another play ...]
Lady Macbeth: What, quite unmann'd in folly?
Macbeth: If I stand here, I saw him.
Lady Macbeth: Fie, for shame!_________________________
Ceci n'est pas un seing.
#148344 - 09/26/05 12:56 PM Re: 'manned/unmanned' and gender neutralisation
Loc: Metro Detroit (MI)
How about staffed/unstaffed? Works better for me than crewed/uncrewed.
#148345 - 09/26/05 04:18 PM Re: 'manned/unmanned' and gender neutralisation
Loc: Marion NC
When we got to the border crossing post, we found it was delicate._________________________
#148346 - 09/27/05 04:01 AM Re: 'manned/unmanned' and gender neutralisation
> How about staffed/unstaffed? Works better for me than crewed/uncrewed.
Good suggestion. I'm sure there are other circumstances where 'staffed' wouldn't work quite as well, but it works well here. It may, for example, sound a little weird to say an 'unstaffed crane'; I think then reverting to 'uncrewed' may be better.
#148347 - 09/27/05 07:27 AM Re: 'manned/unmanned' and gender neutralisation
Such a great thread! I wonder if anybody has any answers for the second part of BYouth's initial post, about a "definitive" (I suppose meaning more or less accepted) list of gender-neutral terms that are preferrable to some of the so-called discriminatory ones?
Forum Stats 8782 Members
Max Online: 3341 @ 12/09/11 02:15 PM
Newest Members katexic, Onewarthill58, river11, Thinsized1992, cat2610275
8782 Registered Users
Who's Online 1 registered (endymion6), 34 Guests and 4 Spiders online. Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters (30 Days)
LukeJavan8 126 endymion6 113 wofahulicodoc 111 Tromboniator 16 Bazr 10 river11 3 BobSteinVisiBone 1 AlimaeHP 1 May 1
wwh 13858 Faldage 13803 Jackie 11610 tsuwm 10526 Buffalo Shrdlu 7210 LukeJavan8 6947 AnnaStrophic 6511 Wordwind 6296 of troy 5400 wofahulicodoc 5335
Board Rules · Mark all read Contact Us · Wordsmith.org · Top
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.
Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat
© 2014 Wordsmith