Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,526
veteran
OP Offline
veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,526

My initial thought was to tell these guys "No," but they seemed to be pretty eager and on further consideration, I told them, at nearly the last minute, that I'd be happy to.

There are lots of kids who don't even consider going to college for one reason or another. They don't consider a career in the sciences, because they think it's too hard for them or because they think it's just "something somebody else does." Maybe they don't know anybody who does these things. "My parents don't do it, their parents didn't do it, my parents' friends don't do it, I've never even met anyone who knows anybody who does it. Why should I even consider it?"
I don't think it's as conscious as this. I suspect it's far more subtle.

In some environments, a child might have lots of opportunities for self-discovery. In others, there might be significantly fewer opportunities. If everyone's homelife were at least remotely comparable, there might be at least a weak case for letting kids figure everything out on their own. But they aren't. Not all children have parents with advanced degrees at home who can mentor them along. Not all kids have very high expectations placed on them.

The school takes a part of one day in an attempt to get the kids to think about things that they normally wouldn't think about. This is hardly an attempt to make them grow up too quickly. I don't know whether it's "the right thing to do," but I don't fault them for trying.

We could take a similar view of family life education, or home ec, or even of physics, "They'll figure it out during self-descovery. We shouldn't make them grow up so soon."

What is the great harm of getting them early and saying, "Look, you really can do whatever you set your mind to doing?" I see lots of upsides here and not one single downside.

k




Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,624
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,624
I agreee with you Ken. Give 'em the info and let them run with it as they will. It's only harmful if you then use it as a stick to beat them with: "Study hard and you can be a scientist, but if you don't ..."


Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,526
veteran
OP Offline
veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,526

I have no idea how I got interested in the sciences. I can't think of a single role model, per se. I got very lucky with a particularly brilliant 5th grade teacher, but I think I was somewhat fascinated with it in a serious way long before then. The only thing, other than a shuttle astronaut, that I ever wanted to be was a scientist. (And I only considered astronaut because I'd heard they needed to have multiple degrees in science.)

My three brothers all live lives very much like my parents'. Out of HS, one brother went into the army, one was a filling station attendant through HS and graduated into being a butcher, and the other a temp blue collar worker. Now, respectively, they put batteries into boxes, lay carpets, and the other loads pallets from a dock onto a truck. These are great jobs - if you like doing them - and that's what you really want to do. Secretary, gardner, garbageman, sewage worker - they're all great things if you like doing them. But just knowing that you do have choices is a great thing.

The thing I tried to get across to the kids was this: work in the sciences is really interesting (I've got to write game programs, help people solve math problems, read a lot, and so forth); you get to do things before most people ever hear about it (internet, voip, networked gaming), you get a pretty good pay for it; anybody can do it if they're willing to work for it; just because you fail at something a few times doesn't mean you can't ever do it well; college is worth the effort.

I don't think I gave any indication that their lives would not be happy and worthwhile were they to prefer something other than science - only that science was an option.

k



Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,322
Members9,182
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Ineffable, ddrinnan, TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV
9,182 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 542 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
tsuwm 10,542
wofahulicodoc 10,535
LukeJavan8 9,916
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5