|About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us|
You are not logged in. [Log In] Wordsmith.org » Forums » General Topics » Q&A about words » feculence Register User Forum List Calendar Active Topics Search FAQ
#121882 - 02/02/04 12:27 AM feculence
Loc: Seattle, Washington, USA
In a column written by Jeff Jacoby in today's (1 February 04) Boston Globe, he decries the use of bad words in the media. His column is posted at http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2004/02/01/the_slippery_slope_into_indecent_language/
In his conclusion he refers to "the feculence of modern life." I had never heard the word before, looked it up, see how he is using it somewhat analogically, and marvel.
#121883 - 02/02/04 06:07 AM Re: feculence
Loc: Utter Placebo, Planet Reebok
It has all the hallmarks of the results of a rummage through a thesaurus. None of the rest of his article hints at the use of such highflown terms for such a lowlife definition!
Well, f**k him, I say!
#121884 - 02/02/04 07:51 AM Re: feculence
Loc: Marion NC
I agree that the author seems to have pulled feculence out a thesaurus, as it certainly is as jarring in the context as the language used elsewhere in the article.
But it's also true that perhaps we need to be jarred a little bit. I admit to the use of salty phrases, etc., but using them on the air is going beyond a line in the airwaves which a genteel society would neither venture nor permit others to venture.
I don't think that this is a "slippery slope to indecent language," as the headline on the article said. It is instead a precipitous descent toward a non-society tarred with the brushes of boorishness, incivility, crassness, crudity.
#121885 - 02/02/04 07:59 AM Re: feculence
I am distressed by the feculence of the wide screen.
#121886 - 02/02/04 09:51 AM Re: feculence
Loc: this too shall pass
in the very next line the phrase "separates the decent from the indecent" appears; at this point I too would have opened my thesaurus (or perphaps not ;) and replaced indecency -- isn't that what a thesaurus is for?!
#121887 - 02/02/04 07:44 PM ithyphallic
So, would you perhaps choose ithyphallic over indecent?
#121888 - 02/02/04 07:45 PM Re: feculence
Loc: British Columbia, Canada
I keep hearing that movie language has to be crude to be "realistic" but somehow it used to possible for a comic to be funny without being indecent and for a tough guy to be tough without four letter words. (although maybe that's why they were the strong silent type)
#121889 - 02/02/04 09:05 PM Re: ithyphallic
would you perhaps choose ithyphallic over indecent?
Since when are fishsticks indecent. What a minute, I'll come in again. Since when did ithyphallic become synonymous with indecent? In Greek, it's a religious word. Dionysius was a generative god.
#121890 - 02/03/04 06:11 AM Since at least 1913
Webster's 1913 Dictionary
Definition: \Ith`y*phal"lic\, a. [L. ithyphallicus, fr.
ithyphallus, Gr. ?, membrum virile erectum, or a figure
thereof carried in the festivals of Bacchus.]
Lustful; lewd; salacious; indecent; obscene.
#121891 - 02/03/04 08:26 AM Re: one citation from 1864
"An ithyphallic audacity that insults what is most sacred and decent among men." In the OED, besides the religious term and a poetical meter, this one citation is used for the gloss: grossly indecent, obscene. I argue that the meaning in the sentence above is the technical one, and the lexicographer has transferred his own repugnance into a new, spurious meaning. But I could be wrong.
Forum Stats 8805 Members
Max Online: 3341 @ 12/09/11 02:15 PM
Newest Members hmazuji, Sukumar, raghav123, bktraveling, Ozade
8805 Registered Users
Who's Online 0 registered (), 17 Guests and 4 Spiders online. Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters (30 Days)
LukeJavan8 75 endymion6 72 wofahulicodoc 68 A C Bowden 27 Tromboniator 10 Jackie 3 May 3 Rhubarb Commando 1 barryp15 1 Raynbeaugirl 1
wwh 13858 Faldage 13803 Jackie 11613 tsuwm 10526 Buffalo Shrdlu 7210 LukeJavan8 7135 AnnaStrophic 6511 Wordwind 6296 wofahulicodoc 5496 of troy 5400
Board Rules · Mark all read Contact Us · Wordsmith.org · Top
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.
Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat
© 2014 Wordsmith