Wordsmith Talk |
About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us | |||
You are not logged in. [Log In] Wordsmith.org » Forums » General Topics » Q&A about words » Begging the question Register User Forum List Calendar Active Topics Search
FAQ
Topic Options ![]()
#115868 - 11/14/03 11:17 AM Re: Begging the question
![]()
old hand
![]()
Registered: 03/16/00
Posts: 1004
Loc: London, UK Now then, now then, now then! This is not a philosophy discussion. Go to www.factsforum.org if you want that sort of fun. I'll see you there!
Also, my 'dialogue' was illustrative of a form of argument, and a fallacy associated with it. I could (almost) just as easily have turned it on its head and made the evolution-champion guilty of assuming the antecedent.
cheer
the sunshine warrior
Top
#115869 - 11/14/03 11:32 AM Re: Begging the question
![]()
Carpal Tunnel
![]()
Registered: 12/01/00
Posts: 13657 Or either you could have pointed out that JW had reduced his argument to the absurd.
I like that assuming the antecedent. I can live with that as a name for the fallacy. I'll have to check on the relative dates of the various definitions of beg. The only time I've heard the word question used in this sense is in the phrase call the question in legislative debate.
Top
#115870 - 11/14/03 11:43 AM Re: Begging the question
![]()
old hand
![]()
Registered: 03/16/00
Posts: 1004
Loc: London, UK Or, indeed, that his argument had become tautologous (or circular) and hence wasn't an argument at all. (Though, of course, according to Ayer and all them thar Logical Positivists, a tautology was something positively to rejoice at, with mathematics and logic giving the dear boys multiples. Shows how fashions in philosophy change, eh?)
cheer
the sunshine warrior
Top
#115871 - 11/19/03 04:53 PM Re: Begging the question
![]()
Pooh-Bah
![]()
Registered: 06/28/02
Posts: 1624
Loc: Utter Placebo, Planet Reebok This is a yart, although I must admit that the discussion this time around has been intelligent and to the point. Faldo and Shanks have excelled themselves. Isn't it time, then, that the thread wandered off into recipe swapping or something? I'd hate to see a precedent set - sticking to the point - but I don't think that I'm begging the question; merely citing Board history in support of my assertion!
Top
Moderator: Jackie
Forum Stats 8428 Members
16 Forums
13687 Topics
209801 Posts
Max Online: 3341 @ 12/09/11 02:15 PM
Newest Members Eva, sylviasuper, continent2, a2teacher, teepee
8427 Registered Users
Who's Online 0 registered (), 34 Guests and 2 Spiders online. Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters (30 Days)
LukeJavan8 85 jenny jenny 57 wofahulicodoc 56 endymion6 50 Rhubarb Commando 37 BranShea 33 Faldage 14 Buffalo Shrdlu 14 zmjezhd 13 tsuwm 11
May Su M Tu W Th F Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Board Rules · Mark all read Contact Us · Wordsmith.org · Top
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.
Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat© 2013 Wordsmith
Previous Topic
Index