Wordsmith Talk |
About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us | |||
You are not logged in. [Log In] Wordsmith.org » Forums » General Topics » Q&A about words » Dis/uninterested Register User Forum List Calendar Active Topics Search
FAQ
Topic Options ![]()
#114328 - 10/24/03 09:16 AM Dis/uninterested
![]()
Carpal Tunnel
![]()
Registered: 12/01/00
Posts: 13653 The word pair disinterested/uninterested is one that sparks some debate in certain circles. As you may be aware, the present day, prescribed definitions are the reverse of what they were several hundred years ago, as a trip to your friendly local OED will confirm (or even AHD4 at http://www.bartleby.com/61/32/D0273200.html). David Carkeet, in his light-hearted TVR article in the September issue (http://www.vocabula.com/2003/VRSept03Carkeet.htm) points out that these words, among others, do not exactly lend themselves to a great stability in meaning. I.e., there is nothing particular about the word disinterested that speaks for it meaning unbiased, impartial as opposed to lacking in interest.
Can anyone think of any other pairs of words that would belong to this dis/un family?
Top
#114329 - 10/24/03 09:31 AM Re: Dis/uninterested
![]()
Carpal Tunnel
![]()
Registered: 04/03/00
Posts: 10463
Loc: this too shall pass purely as a matter of interest, you understand, this is a many time yart. one of the instances links to the M-W usage gloss.
http://wordsmith.org/board/showthreaded.pl?Cat=&Board=words&Number=96868
Top
#114330 - 10/24/03 09:31 AM Re: Dis/uninterested
![]()
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 01/18/01
Posts: 13858 Disinterred would mean dug up. Uninterred would mean not buried. At least that is my impression.
Top
#114331 - 10/24/03 09:42 AM Re: Dis/uninterested
![]()
Carpal Tunnel
![]()
Registered: 12/01/00
Posts: 13653 Good one, Dr Bill.
And, tsuwm, the long involved explanation was using dis/uninterested merely as a starting point. Mainly I'm interested in word pairs such as the one offered by Dr Bill. I plead not guilty to any charge of default and yartery.
Top
#114332 - 10/24/03 12:58 PM Re: Dis/uninterested
![]()
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 08/27/02
Posts: 2154
Loc: British Columbia, Canada On a slight tangent check out Trustfulness/trustworthyness in Meta-words south of the line.
Top
#114333 - 10/24/03 04:21 PM jointedness
![]()
Carpal Tunnel
![]()
Registered: 09/06/00
Posts: 2788
Loc: Seattle, Washington, USA Disjointed means that the object was, at one time, connected at the joints, but these are either broken or out of place. Unjointed means that the object had no joints in the first place.
Top
#114334 - 10/24/03 04:36 PM a detour
![]()
Carpal Tunnel
![]()
Registered: 03/15/00
Posts: 6511
Loc: lower upstate New York Father Steve's post reminded me of something: the correct term for Siamese twins now is "co-joined" twins. Why not "joined"?
Top
#114335 - 10/24/03 04:43 PM Re: a detour
![]()
addict
Registered: 03/09/01
Posts: 508
Loc: Metro Detroit (MI) I've only ever seen it as "conjoined" when referring to twins, but the question still holds: What's wrong with plain old "joined?"
Top
#114336 - 10/24/03 05:27 PM Re: a detour
![]()
addict
Registered: 12/03/02
Posts: 555 What's wrong with plain old "joined?"
Conjoined, to clearly characterise a seamless contiguity. Plain join doesn't do that.
Top
#114337 - 10/24/03 06:07 PM Re: jointedness
![]()
Carpal Tunnel
![]()
Registered: 12/01/00
Posts: 13653 Another good one. Thanks, Father.
Top
Moderator: Jackie
Forum Stats 8423 Members
16 Forums
13686 Topics
209764 Posts
Max Online: 3341 @ 12/09/11 02:15 PM
Newest Members teepee, smoothcriminal86, janbra, junebug, Stephen A
8423 Registered Users
Who's Online 0 registered (), 40 Guests and 2 Spiders online. Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters (30 Days)
LukeJavan8 88 jenny jenny 63 wofahulicodoc 53 endymion6 46 Rhubarb Commando 35 BranShea 34 Buffalo Shrdlu 17 Jackie 15 zmjezhd 14 Faldage 12
May Su M Tu W Th F Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Board Rules · Mark all read Contact Us · Wordsmith.org · Top
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.
Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat© 2013 Wordsmith
Previous Topic
Index