Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#10919 11/21/00 07:48 AM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,788
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,788
I received a grumpy e-mail message from a cyber-hip correspondent today in which he suggested that I had violated "netiquette" by placing my response to a previous message below (rather than preceding) the copy of that message produced when one hits the "reply to author" button on one's e-mail manager.

Netiquette? Say it isn't so -- the word, not the practice.





#10920 11/21/00 08:17 AM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,004
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,004
Sorry Father - but I've seen it before so often as to now consider it unremarkable. So yes, I suspect that descriptive (rather than the authoritatively prescriptive) lexicons should contain it.


#10921 11/21/00 01:37 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 197
X
member
Offline
member
X
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 197
I've seen netiquitte in regular use since 1994, which was my first contact with the net. Actually, I think I saw it more frequently back then, when most people didn't know the "rules" of the cyber lifestyle. It was so common back then that I simply assumed that it was simply part of (and as old as) the net. It recently occured to me that the word has declined in usage. I assume the reason is because there are so many people online now that it would be difficult to impose politeness rules on the masses.


#10922 11/21/00 02:55 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
F
veteran
Offline
veteran
F
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
netiquette in regular use since 1994

That sounds right to me too, xara.

Here's an "invented" word that I don't mind, as it's useful and fairly clear. I'd take the meaning as something like
guidelines for politeness and understandability when communicating using the Internet or World Wide Web

I suppose etiquette implies something more formal than netiquette could ever be - but on the other hand, it's not as if the rules of etiquette were followed rigidly in every household in the world even when they were considered of the greatest importance.

[quick rant]
I'd consider it good netiquette for communications to allow for viewing on any browser and on any platform. This is the way the Web was designed, so shouldn't be a problem. But there are a lot of ill-mannered Websites out there!
[/quick rant]



#10923 11/21/00 03:38 PM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
>to allow for viewing on any browser and on any platform
[ranting response]
shona, this is because there was/is no standard for the way that HTML is *interpreted*. this is supremely stupid, but there IS a putative standard for writing HTML, but as a web publisher I have absolutely no guarantee as to how different browsers will "read" my pages. this is a swell thing for the writers of "web pages for dummies" and the like...
[/ranting response off]

my calmer self will now step to the fore and tell you that most "amateur" publishers will, in an attempt to maintain their readers (and sanity), limit themselves to verifying their own pages with the major browsers (e.g., IE, Netscape, perhaps AOL (ha!)).

#10924 11/21/00 05:14 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,788
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,788

Is our prohibition of ridiculing the typographic errors of our correspondents a species of local netiquette?




#10925 11/21/00 05:34 PM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Sanctions against carping about typos and spelling seem to be internet-wide; but I think that it's those who can't spell or type that shout the loudest. I think we may be overly polite by desisting here in this local wordy environment -- if we can't seek a higher standard here, what recourse do we have??

[speaking of shouting, just try typing a message in all-caps and see how long you can get away with THAT...]


#10926 11/21/00 07:42 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 197
X
member
Offline
member
X
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 197
>>ill-mannered Websites out there!<<

I can only speak for myself here, but I should point out that in a non commercial setting, it's impossible for one to check all platforms. In our house we use unix as our operating system, (sometimes mac, but not regularly) and any product with microsoft printed anywhere on it is strictly forbidden to enter. This in mind, it is quite difficult for me to fully check my own sites on many browsers.

Another point could to be made is that it could be quite expensive and time consuming to assemble all the possible combinations of hardware and software. I have simply learned that quite often mainstream software does not work for my system. I give more merrit to those sites that take the time and effort to consider my platform.


#10927 11/21/00 10:11 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,788
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,788
Xara says: "I give more merit to those sites that take the time and effort to consider my platform."

My platform is lower taxes, a shorter work-week, and free beer on the Queen's Birthday.








#10928 11/21/00 10:37 PM
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,094
J
old hand
Offline
old hand
J
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,094
My platform is lower taxes, a shorter work-week, and free beer on the Queen's Birthday.

But Father, surely you do not advocate avarice, sloth and gluttony.


Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,328
Members9,182
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Ineffable, ddrinnan, TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV
9,182 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 939 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
tsuwm 10,542
wofahulicodoc 10,539
LukeJavan8 9,916
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5