Wordsmith.org
Posted By: Wordwind HAPPY VALENTINE'S DAY! - 02/14/03 12:31 PM
Some like the day; others shrug it off.

But I'm in an elementary school where children dressed in red are delivering their Valentines, happy to be ambassadors of affection.

So, in the spirit of their streams of red tracing through our halls at this moment:

Happy Valentine's Day!

Posted By: Jackie Re: HAPPY VALENTINE'S DAY! - 02/14/03 01:34 PM
DITTO!

Posted By: Buffalo Shrdlu Re: HAPPY VALENTINE'S DAY! - 02/14/03 01:41 PM
in our school, everybody in the building has a pink heart on a string with their name on it; these are traded throughout the day. every hour or so a name is called, the person wearing that name and the person named get a prize! I haven't won yet...

Posted By: Alex Williams Re: HAPPY VALENTINE'S DAY! - 02/14/03 08:57 PM
bah humbug

Posted By: wow Re: HAPPY VALENTINE'S DAY! - 02/15/03 04:20 PM
I received a couple of e-Valentine greetings and they were much appreciated.
But.
With the price they are getting for cards these days, I just cannot afford to send cards ... and for those far away whom I love (son and two OLD friends) I just sent a note on my personal stationery.
Remember when cards were $1? Now you can't seem to get anything less than $2.50 and it mounts up fast.
But it is nice to get real letters in the mail. I love getting envelopes that do not have windows!
With a heart full of affection for all the AWADers. ALOHA!

Posted By: modestgoddess Re: HAPPY VALENTINE'S DAY! - 02/16/03 10:02 PM
bah humbug

Or....Happy VD!

as some of us bitter singletons like to say....(well, okay - only me, so far, among my acquaintance!)

Posted By: Bingley Re: HAPPY VALENTINE'S DAY! - 02/17/03 04:14 AM
A USn friend was somewhat surprised when I informed her that in the UK it is usual to send Valentine cards unsigned. Apparently this is not true everywhere. So, who signs and who doesn't?

Bingley
Posted By: Jackie Re: HAPPY VALENTINE'S DAY! - 02/17/03 02:25 PM
Anonymous Valentines? But, but...what would be the point?

Posted By: Faldage Re: anonymous VALENTINEs - 02/17/03 02:31 PM
what would be the point?

It still works just fine for reminding the unpopular kids that they are total loosers.

Posted By: wow Re: anonymous VALENTINEs - 02/17/03 02:43 PM
Right you are Faldage. I do not believe in having children exchange Valentines in school for that reason. One teacher I know had each child bring one valentine. They all went in a box, and each child picked one. The celebration was cupcakes and milk provided by the teacher.
Much kinder, I opine.

Posted By: dxb Re: anonymous VALENTINEs - 02/17/03 04:30 PM
Much kinder, I opine.

I believe you're right, wow. My wife has her kids make their own cards and then take them home to their mums.

Posted By: AnnaStrophic Re: anonymous VALENTINEs - 02/17/03 05:50 PM
My wife has her kids make their own cards and then take them home to their mums.

Do the moms know who they're from?

Posted By: sjm Re: anonymous VALENTINEs - 02/17/03 06:22 PM
>they are still loosers.

Even knowing it was bait, I still couldn't resist biting - Aaaaargh!

Posted By: Faldage Re: anonymous VALENTINEs - 02/17/03 06:24 PM
loosers

It was done with malice aforethought.

Posted By: WhitmanO'Neill Re: anonymous VALENTINEs - 02/17/03 06:32 PM
loosers

It was done with malice aforethought.


Whattaya, kicking into moose mode there, Faldo? or mebbe it was just a friendly little Valentine[evil-grin e]


Posted By: sjm Re: anonymous VALENTINEs - 02/17/03 10:11 PM
>loosers

It was done with malice aforethought.


As I well knew.

Posted By: consuelo Re: anonymous VALENTINEs - 02/18/03 03:59 AM
I know someone who got the same valentine from her sweetie that she got for him. We were wondering what the odds of that happening would be. Any takers from the Math squad?

Posted By: dxb Re: anonymous VALENTINEs - 02/18/03 07:15 AM
Do the moms know who they're from?

Well, they may get the cards mixed up now and then while all the excess paint is drying, and sometimes a child may decide someone else's card looks better than theirs, although this attitude is, I am told, vehemently discouraged. I doubt if the mums would be any the wiser though!

Interesting by the way that in the UK we tend to use 'mum' and 'mummy' while in the USA you tend to use 'mom' and 'mommy'. Wonder how that happened.


Posted By: Bean Re: anonymous VALENTINEs - 02/18/03 10:58 AM
Stranger still is that I say "mum" and write "mom".

Posted By: Faldage Re: anonymous VALENTINEs - 02/18/03 11:01 AM
what the odds of that happening would be

The odds that some couple somewhere would send each other the same valentine's card? I'd say pretty dang close to 1 to 1. Say 1 to 0.999...

Posted By: consuelo Re: anonymous VALENTINEs - 02/18/03 11:26 AM
How d'you figure that, Faldage? Show your work, please

Posted By: Faldage Re: SWAGs - 02/18/03 02:34 PM
How d'you figure that

It's just a SWAG. I've got a 43 page doc to proof, but I 'll get on showing you my work when I get a chance.

Posted By: birdfeed Re: anonymous VALENTINEs - 02/18/03 02:35 PM
"Stranger still is that I say "mum" and write "mom"."

But yer Canajan, eh? That's what yer spozed to do.

Posted By: modestgoddess Re: anonymous VALENTINEs - 02/19/03 12:30 AM
and I sez "Mum" and writes "Mum."

In fact, me own Mum, being British by birth, despises "Mom" - so as kids my brothers and I quickly learned to "fix" any cards we gave her (birthday, mother's day etc) so that the offending "o" was replaced by the proper "u."

Posted By: Jackie Re: anonymous VALENTINEs - 02/20/03 04:37 PM
in the UK we tend to use 'mum' and 'mummy' while in the USA you tend to use 'mom' and 'mommy'. Wonder how that happened.
Your-all's are better preserved, obviously...


Posted By: Buffalo Shrdlu Re: anonymous VALENTINEs - 02/20/03 05:28 PM
of course you know the story of the quartet of young cousins, all named Melvin(family name, natch). seems the little rapscallions snuck into the kitchen to steal cookies, when they heard their mothers returning found no where to go: where were four Mel's to hide?

Posted By: AnnaStrophic four Mels to hide - 02/20/03 08:09 PM
That's worse and more contrived than anything TEd has come up with recently.

You're welcome.

Posted By: Jackie Re: anonymous VALENTINEs - 02/20/03 10:30 PM
eta--that was absolutely...pitiful.

Posted By: Buffalo Shrdlu Re: anonymous VALENTINEs - 02/21/03 02:47 AM
hahahahahaha!

it has kept me smiling all day...

Posted By: Jackie Re: anonymous VALENTINEs - 02/21/03 02:54 AM
Honey, you really need to get out more...

Posted By: Wordwind Re: four Mels to hide - 02/21/03 05:01 AM
I don't get it. Somebody explain it to me so I can smile all day, too, like et'...

Posted By: WhitmanO'Neill Re: four Mels to hide - 02/21/03 05:13 AM
Dear WW,

4 mules to hide (to skin to cure the leather)...get it? [wonk] (oops...I meant )

Posted By: Wordwind Re: four Mels to hide - 02/21/03 05:15 AM
Well, I never heard of four mules to hide. Is this from a song or a poem or something I should have read or heard by now?

Posted By: Buffalo Shrdlu Re: four Mels to hide - 02/21/03 10:13 AM
Honey, you really need to get out more...

believe me, I'm getting out too much! that's why I need something silly to keep me going...

WW - think mummy, think preservation...

think very bad pun...

Posted By: Faldage Re: four Mels to hide - 02/21/03 11:36 AM
4 mules to hide

Is that another pun? Do I still bless my pun-blindness?

Posted By: Jackie Re: four Mels to hide - 02/21/03 11:41 AM
4 mules to hide

Is that another pun? Do I still bless my pun-blindness?
See Sarah.



Posted By: Faldage Re: Sarah - 02/21/03 11:57 AM
See Sarah

Who? What? Do I really want to?

Posted By: AnnaStrophic Re: shaggy dogs - 02/21/03 12:05 PM
If I may, I think the problem here is the set-up, young eta. The story has nothing to do with the punchline. Now, if you'd worked in something about preserving the cookies... (where is TEd when we need him??)

Posted By: Buffalo Shrdlu Re: shaggy dogs - 02/21/03 02:08 PM
young eta

oh, bless you.

you're right, it should have been four small Egyptian boys...

Posted By: WhitmanO'Neill Re: shaggy dogs - 02/21/03 02:16 PM
Actually®, eta, I thought you were talking about formaldehyde! in the plural

Posted By: AnnaStrophic Re: shaggy dogs - 02/21/03 02:31 PM
Juan, you taking over ron obvious's job?

Posted By: WhitmanO'Neill Re: shaggy dogs - 02/21/03 03:19 PM
Juan, you taking over ron obvious's job?

No, AnnaS...he's ron obvious, I'm WO'N obvious, 'member? Whit said, obscuringly.



Posted By: Buffalo Shrdlu Re: shaggy dogs - 02/21/03 05:24 PM
"Mummy, can we wrap this up?" he asked swiftly.

Posted By: wow Re: Mom Mum Mommy Mummy - 02/22/03 03:38 PM
in the UK we tend to use 'mum' and 'mummy' while in the USA you tend to use 'mom' and 'mommy'. Wonder how that happened.
I was scolded for using "Mummy" as my Mother said she was not an embalmed Egyptian! Actually, I called my mother "Mother." and that's what my sons call me.

Posted By: sjm Re: Mom Mum Mommy Mummy - 02/22/03 05:15 PM
>Actually, I called my mother "Mother." and that's what my sons call me.

My Dadand his siblings all called their father "Father", and that is what his grandchildren all call him too. He died a month before I was born, but when any of his grandchildren speak of "Father" we know instantly to whom they refer.

© Wordsmith.org