Wordsmith.org
Posted By: maverick 2nd comings - 01/29/02 01:04 PM
Can I quietly point out that there are posts about language, posts involving wordplay, and prolly even a good recipe or two available in other parts of this fine board? ~ go there, now!

Posted By: tsuwm Re: 2nd comings - 01/29/02 04:08 PM
yeahbut®, mav. I'm stuck here in the 8th dimension -- can't get out.
-joe (buckeroo) bfstplk

Posted By: maverick Re: goat busters - 01/29/02 04:11 PM
I'm stuck here

who we gonna call? ~

jeez, missing you here joe!

Posted By: Faldage Re: Hey, joe - 01/29/02 04:27 PM
Long's yer not here mebbe you could not drop over to Q&A and state the obvious for hev.

Lessn Dr. Bill set her straight.

Posted By: wwh Re: Hey, joe - 01/29/02 04:48 PM
Dear Faldage: sounds obvious you can't keep tsuwm's numerous personae straight.

Posted By: wwh Re: Hey, maverick - 01/29/02 09:23 PM
I thought your header was referring to all the archie copycats.

Posted By: belMarduk Re: 2nd comings - 01/31/02 11:00 PM
Phewf, I thought he was referring to something else.

bad belMarduk, bad, bad - off to the gutter with you

Posted By: maverick Re: 2nd comings - 01/31/02 11:13 PM
off to the gutter...

so which side of the street is it, Bel, and can more than one come and play?

Posted By: of troy Re: 2nd comings - 01/31/02 11:52 PM
mav, dear, you know we have always told you, the more, the merrier..
but don't let Jackie catch me with you! she is so protective of all her men, and she claims every man as her own--no doubt to protect them from the likes of me-- men die for me!

Posted By: belMarduk Re: 2nd comings - 02/01/02 01:25 AM
so which side of the street is it,

dag nabbit, another man that needs directions to get to it.

ahhhhh ha, so that's what Jackie meant last year when she said she had it on good authority that mav *never arrived anywhere too quickly. It wasn't the veiled compliment we all thought it was. It was actually a sad, sad commentary on the fact that he didn't know how to get there, and a second time was out of the question.


Posted By: Jackie Re: 2nd comings - 02/01/02 02:12 AM
Oh, bel, I am howling! C'mon, I'll crawl into the gutter with you, we'll wave a signal flag at mav, and then if he still takes a long time CENSORED OUTing, we'll give him some really good directions, eh?

Posted By: consuelo Shhhhhhhhhhhhh! - 02/01/02 02:20 AM
You girls are making too much noise in here. Here I was, peacefully enjoying a little afterglow and, PLOP, then PLOP... two more in the gutter with me. Hey, Jackie, I thought you said you don't share. Trying to make me jealous?Move over, Bing cherie, we have company.

Posted By: Keiva Re: 2nd comings - 02/01/02 03:06 AM
so which side of the street is it
dag nabbit, another man that needs directions to get to it.

and bel, don't forget Kiwi, whose directional sense is well-known roundabout now.


Posted By: Angel Re: 2nd comings - 02/01/02 04:07 AM
and bel, don't forget Kiwi, whose directional sense is well-known roundabout now.

But, Keiva, he wasn't trying to find a gutter. I'm sure he could have found that without a sign! Ok, Kiwi, I'll stop picking on you now. Love ya!

Posted By: maverick come over here & say that! - 02/01/02 10:38 AM
a second time was out of the question

d'ya need testamanacles, bel? My memory may be slipping in this second childhood, but I can provide them to the effect I can still count to four or more, and I can still recite my 69-times table almost endlessly

Posted By: Jackie Re: come over here & say that! - 02/01/02 12:03 PM
come over here & say that!
Was that an invitation, my dear??

Now, Consuelo--you really must stop trying to get my goat. I know perfectly well that Bingley was not in the gutter with you. 'Cause he was with ME!

Posted By: Bingley Re: come over here & say that! - 02/01/02 12:23 PM
Ladies, in present circumstances, I have no intention of joining either of you in the gutter. I don't like the look of that water. Goodness only knows what's floating about in there.

Bingley
Posted By: Jackie Re: come over here & say that! - 02/01/02 01:05 PM
My dear Bingley--you notice, I did NOT say that you and I were in the gutter. Let's not tell where we really were...now, why does a recent post of my Aunt's come to mind?

Posted By: of troy This is bad!--ooh, i am so bad! - 02/01/02 01:13 PM
Consuelo--you really must stop trying to get my goat..

Why? what would she do with it if she had it? what do you do with it? is this some other new fetish?

Have i missed something? hanging out with guys and all their sheep-- thinking a little lambakins was at once a lawn mower and wool provide [wide eyed innocence icon here]-- only to find there was a reason the sheep were nervous... and meanwhile.. all you gals has something going on with a goat?

a Goat?

Posted By: maverick Re: This is bad!--ooh, i am so bad! - 02/01/02 02:53 PM
a Goat?

yeah, what the dickens is going on - is something illegal being advocated?

Posted By: Keiva Re: This is bad!--ooh, i am so bad! - 02/01/02 04:14 PM
is something illegal being advocated?

Not a ghost of a chance, mav. If there were, I'd follow, for whither thou goest, I goest. [withering -e]

[This could lead to a capricornucopia of puns. TEd?]

mav, we've already dicussed your legs ... shall we discuss withers? We men are so sensitive about anatomy.


Posted By: maverick Re: This is bad!--ooh, i am so bad! - 02/01/02 04:27 PM
We men are so sensitive about anatomy.

Speak for yourself ~ oh, just remembered that you both do!

Posted By: belMarduk Re: come over here & say that! - 02/02/02 12:25 AM
I can still count to four or more, and I can still recite my 69-times table almost endlessly

Ah, now I see the problem. It is very difficult to remain rigidly at attention to the task at hand when one doing math.


Posted By: maverick Re: come over here & say that! - 02/02/02 12:35 AM
Some things in life, bel, you can *always count on!

Posted By: Keiva Re: come over here & say that! - 02/02/02 01:00 AM
Just to attempt to keep this thread vaguely word-related, may I commend to mav and bel the word "motel", and point out what that spells backwards?

Posted By: of troy letom? - 02/02/02 01:11 AM
Huh? i got counting to 4, and 69 times tables.. but i don't get..the word "motel", and point out what that spells backwards?

is it suppose to make sense? LETOM--let'om? (it should be Let'em?) and it seems to me, if Mav and bel are getting a room, it had better be a suite.. at last count, Jackie, connie and i were planning to be there too..(did you want to be invited too, Kieva? will you tell us the secret of letom?)and are we bringing Jackie's goat? what will we do with it? will we have problems? some places are soo particular who they let in.



Posted By: consuelo whispering so Jackie won't hear us - 02/02/02 01:24 PM
Good cover, Bing cherie! Thank you for the candy, by the way. Delicious! Candy is always appreciated this time of year, 'specially dark chocolate in a heart shaped container.kiss-kiss

Posted By: Keiva Re: Reflections on Ice-Breaking - 02/02/02 02:56 PM
Absolutely hilarious! [For newcomers who might not spot the inside joke:
http://216.12.219.209/board/showthreaded.pl?Cat=&Board=wordplay&Number=40206&page=&view=&sb=&vc=1]

{white}Candy is always appreciated this time of year, 'specially dark chocolate in a heart shaped container. kiss-kiss {/white}

Bing, a bit of advice from Ogden Nash (whose poem's title is my subject-line above):
Candy
Is dandy,
But liquor
Is quicker.






Posted By: WhitmanO'Neill Re: now about that goat reference... - 02/02/02 03:10 PM
For goat in Webster's, the second meaning among three:

2: a licentious man: LECHER
Well, why do you think they call it a goatee?

But it could be worse, it could be a gnu.

Posted By: Keiva Re: now about that goat reference... - 02/02/02 03:29 PM
But it could be worse, it could be a gnu.
a gnu?
ag-nu?
Are you making reference to our former Vice President Ag-new? If so, dear W'ON, I thoroughly agree with you! But please, let's not clean up a perfectly good feelthy thread.


Posted By: Jackie Re: whispering so Jackie won't hear us - 02/02/02 05:14 PM
Well, consuelo, I see that my Bingley has been his usual polite self, with you. I don't mind. But you should know--he has shared his candy with me.

Posted By: Jackie Re: come over here & say that! - 02/02/02 05:21 PM
Some things in life, bel, you can *always count on!
Like the fact that you can do math while one hand is uh, otherwise occupied?Come and show me how you count, my pretty ...bel & I will help--we can count on our fingers.(Ooh, I am being SO bad! bel, this is all your fault!)

Posted By: consuelo Re: come over here & say that! - 02/02/02 06:22 PM
Oh, oh. Jackie's getting pretty comfy here in the gutter with us! She sure is using a lot of white these days, too!>EG< I think we have corrupted her beyond saving now. Is there a word for that? tsuwm?

Posted By: Keiva Re: recall the thread's original title? - 02/02/02 06:33 PM
I think we have corrupted her beyond saving now.

Once down, 'tis difficult to rise again?
I think we have corrupted her beyond saving now. Is there a word for that?

Debaucherized? Have me made Jackie an official debauchee?

Posted By: tsuwm Re: corrupted beyond saving - 02/02/02 07:43 PM
>is there a word for that?

well, since we're talking about Jackie, acolyte of the sainted Anu, I feel constrained to make the supreme effort:

she is irredeemable, irreclaimable, irretrievable, and thoroughly depraved [WO'N: debauched]; she has been, in two words, corrupted (and) vitiated. and the foremost of all these can be abbreviated irred, which even suggests that she hardly don't blush no more.

-joe (quality vs. substance) friday
Posted By: Jackie Re: recall the thread's original title? - 02/02/02 07:52 PM
Once down, 'tis difficult to rise again?
Not for some, my dear! Why, I've known one who got up three times in an hour...Love, Irred (note no blushing!)

Posted By: Capital Kiwi Re: recall the thread's original title? - 02/02/02 09:14 PM
vitiated

Oh well, there's no hope then. Jackie, it's been really nice knowing you. I hope you're bound for a better place ...

Now, if it was "mcvittiated" that would just take the biscuit, it really would ...

Posted By: Keiva Re: recall the thread's original title? - 02/02/02 10:02 PM
I hope you're bound
Bound? unbound! She is woman; hear her roar!!!!
(oyez! oyez!)

Posted By: Keiva Re: recall the thread's original title? - 02/02/02 11:00 PM
As she has now reached the irreducible level, a poem [abbreviated] may illustrate the difficulty of her rising again:

A whale of great porosity / and small specific gravity,
Dived down with much velocity / beneath the sea's concavity.

But soon the weight of water / squeezed in his large immensity,
Which varied -- as it ought to -- / Inversely as his density.

It would have moved to pity / an Ogre or a Hessian,
To see poor Spermaceti / thus suffering compression.

At length old million-pounder, / low on a bed of coral,
Gave his last dying flounder, / whereto I pen this moral,

O, let this tale dramatic, / anent the whale Norwegian
And pressure hydrostatic, / warn you, my young collegian,

That down-compelling forces / increase as you get deeper;
The lower down your course is, / the upward path's the steeper.


Posted By: Jackie Re: recall the thread's original title? - 02/03/02 12:13 AM
A whale I am, I admit;
The name is a dismaying fit;
But I ain't no Norwegian,
My older collegian--
Now swishing my skirts, I will git.

Posted By: Angel Re: recall the thread's original title? - 02/03/02 02:54 AM
My electric was off for two days
I couldn't get online to metaphrase
Now Jackie's a whale?
She wants a goat, not a male?
Is this some new kind of craze?


Posted By: Bobyoungbalt Groan - 02/04/02 03:24 AM
O tempora! O mores!

First we descend to the gutter, then to battling limericks! What has this distinguished company come to?

Well, on second thought, I'm fond of a good laugh and it certainly beats some of our other carryings on. Go to it all ye poetasters!



Posted By: tsuwm Re: Groan - 02/04/02 03:35 AM
>Go to it all ye poetasters!

yeah, better a poetaster than a criticaster.

Posted By: Bingley Reply to Mr. Nash - 02/04/02 12:57 PM
In reply to:

Bing, a bit of advice from Ogden Nash (whose poem's title is my subject-line above):
Candy
Is dandy,
But liquor
Is quicker.


Candi may be a bit of a dandy
But if liquor made him quicker
-- oh my poor ticker.







Bingley

Posted By: Keiva Re: Groan - 02/04/02 06:54 PM
better a poetaster than a criticaster.

It is a rare and marvelous thing to be a latinate criticaster.
But I, unfortunately, am no unerring polylingual.

[he said, in googlewhacking purple prose -e]

© Wordsmith.org