Wordsmith.org
Posted By: hogmaster it's hogwash, exactly; or maybe not - 07/26/09 02:39 AM
giving in to temptation, the word is eonism

PM your def'ns to me no later than Aug 1, or within the se'nnight, whichever comes last.
Posted By: BranShea Re: it's hogwash, exactly; or maybe not - 07/26/09 08:34 AM
YES ! : or maybe not?
Posted By: olly Re: it's hogwash, exactly; or maybe not - 07/26/09 08:53 PM
Ahaaa! We harken to the call like pigs to the trough.
I'm in.
Baby makes three.
Posted By: Jackie Re: it's hogwash, exactly; or maybe not - 07/27/09 03:04 AM
Moi aussi.
Posted By: hogmaster Re: it's hogwash, exactly; or maybe not - 07/27/09 06:02 AM
wofa asks, via PM, "and how could we tell the difference?".

one version is both the same; or, estoppel from the roolz committee.
-ron o.
Posted By: hogmaster Re: it's hogwash, exactly; or maybe not - 07/30/09 11:16 PM
more clarity on the 'maybe not'...

I have three(3) entries to this point.
Posted By: musick Re: it's hogwash, exactly; or maybe not - 07/31/09 03:54 AM
It's been awhile... I'll pen one.
Posted By: Faldage Re: it's hogwash, exactly; or maybe not - 07/31/09 10:28 AM
I'm working on it.
Posted By: Owlbow Re: it's hogwash, exactly; or maybe not - 07/31/09 04:10 PM
Thanks
I'm trying for one now - 'just noticed the post.
Posted By: AnnaStrophic Re: it's hogwash, exactly; or maybe not - 07/31/09 07:05 PM
This is madness! There's the obvious ... and there's everything else. I can't get past the former.
Posted By: tsuwm Re: it's hogwash, exactly; or maybe not - 07/31/09 07:16 PM
>I can't get past the former.

well, you know the hogmaster and his penchant for armilsŪ; so caveat lector and all that.
Posted By: AnnaStrophic Re: it's hogwash, exactly; or maybe not - 08/01/09 12:12 PM
Indeed, tsuwm.
Posted By: twosleepy Re: it's hogwash, exactly; or maybe not - 08/01/09 08:28 PM
Originally Posted By: tsuwm
>I can't get past the former.

well, you know the hogmaster and his penchant for armilsŪ; so caveat lector and all that.


Bracelets? You got some splainin' to do, Ricky...
Posted By: tsuwm Re: armilŪ - 08/01/09 08:56 PM
the history of this is nearly lost in the mists of time (i.e., it's somewhat of an inside joke), but you can find the hazy vestiges by slogging through this brume: link

(the crux of it is that the hogwash word armil produced a lot of def'ns based on armadillos and such like, and as a result I instituted the memorial armilŪ awards)
Posted By: twosleepy Re: armilŪ - 08/02/09 01:01 AM
You do not have permission to use the search engine.
Posted By: latishya Re: armilŪ - 08/02/09 01:10 AM
Originally Posted By: twosleepy
You do not have permission to use the search engine.


nor do i.
Posted By: Faldage Re: armilŪ - 08/02/09 01:20 AM
Same here.

Edit: However:

Behold
Posted By: tsuwm Re: armilŪ - 08/02/09 02:43 AM
as for my link, huh.

it was to the results page on a board search for armil, which in addition to Faldo's link also had links to follow-ons such as the thread where subsequent armil awards where announced. so, if you really have an interest, you can click on the forum search (in the blue shaded header) and plug the word 'armil' into the little pop-up window and see the same results (oldest listed last).

edit: not everyone has blue headers!
Posted By: hogmaster Re: it's hogwash, exactly; or maybe not - 08/02/09 12:01 PM
Originally Posted By: Owlbow
I'm trying for one now - 'just noticed the post.


the requisite sennight having elapsed, I'm going to give the laggards a little leeway — I do have eight entries with which to entice y'all. and you too, ASp.
what a fun re-read!
Posted By: Jackie Re: it's hogwash, exactly; or maybe not - 08/03/09 03:02 AM
Wasn't it, though? :-) Wish I could have found the answer thread.
Posted By: tsuwm Re: it's hogwash, exactly; or maybe not - 08/03/09 03:13 AM
et viola! the answer thread

-joe (the answer man) friday

p.s. - I tried to use my link, but. "You do not have permission to use the search engine." so I did the search again, and having done the search again, I happened to click my link again, and it worked.
Posted By: Jackie Re: it's hogwash, exactly; or maybe not - 08/03/09 03:32 AM
Thanks,
.
Posted By: tsuwm Re: it's hogwash, exactly; or maybe not - 08/03/09 03:41 AM
while I'm on a roll, here's a couple more links:

1) did you see a dilbert 404 page? try this:
the Dilbert attaboy system

2) here's a link to one of the armilŪ awards: link
Posted By: olly Re: it's hogwash, exactly; or maybe not - 08/03/09 04:06 AM
Ha! Reminds me of the Sleestak
Posted By: BranShea Re: it's hogwash, exactly; or maybe not - 08/03/09 02:22 PM
Uhmmmm... are you all sitting on a park bench ( old times, gold times ) or did we not do our homework right Hogmaster?
Shall we all add one more entry under a false name? (I wouldn't mind.)

Quote:
Lovely disguise, Jackie!
Posted By: Owlbow Re: it's hogwash, exactly; or maybe not - 08/03/09 03:09 PM
Thanks for the leeway Master.
I'm finally in.

Owlbow, notorious laggard.

Thanks and good luck to all.
Posted By: BranShea Re: it's hogwash, exactly; or maybe not - 08/03/09 03:16 PM
Oops!, sorry. I was the owl, that otherwise wonderful bird that brought on the delay. Sorry Hogmaster( for also revealing your identitiy, gonna change that right away.)
Posted By: Jackie Re: it's hogwash, exactly; or maybe not - 08/04/09 02:15 AM
Quote: Lovely disguise, Jackie!
Hey, that was tsuwm, not me! He's the danged arm(ad)il(lo)!
Posted By: tsuwm Re: it's hogwash, exactly; or maybe not - 08/04/09 02:34 AM
feeling a bit prickly in that armor, J? laugh
Posted By: Jackie Re: it's hogwash, exactly; or maybe not - 08/04/09 02:36 AM
Come here, sir, and I'll prickle YOU! laugh
© Wordsmith.org