Wordsmith.org
Posted By: storkie1 only word - 03/12/01 12:23 PM
Besides "bookkeeper", what is the only English word that has back to back "K"'s in it?

Answer tomorrow.

Posted By: tsuwm Re: only word - 03/12/01 02:59 PM
oh my... you need to define your parameters better with questions like this. do you mean 'common' English word? and what do you mean by 'English'? (a search of even the woefully inadequate AHD reveals at least 17 answers!)

here are five(5) that are pretty common English by most definitions:

Hanukkah
jackknife
knickknack
lockkeeper
trekker


Posted By: of troy Re: only word - 03/12/01 03:12 PM
How about a double U-- vacuum springs to mind-- can you think of others?-- i know only one.

Posted By: tsuwm Re: only word - 03/12/01 03:24 PM
I have two really useful [ahem] ones in my wwftd list.

Posted By: shanks Re: only word - 03/12/01 03:28 PM
Hey Storkie1

Don't get pout off by tsuwm's grumpiness. ( to tsuwm!!) I liked the challenge. And I like Helen's too. Any idea about the "uu"s?

cheer

the sunshine warrior

Posted By: of troy Re: only word - 03/12/01 03:35 PM
i should have know!

You'll share them with us at some time?

Posted By: wow Re: only word - 03/12/01 03:37 PM
Hey Storkie1 ... Don't get pout off

Chuckle chuckle ... good one Shanks.

Welcome Storkie1 ...stay with us, it's a great ride!
wow



Posted By: tsuwm Re: only word - 03/12/01 03:41 PM
shanks, you are correct; questions like that *do make me grumpy. which one do you suppose is the *right* answer?

Posted By: shanks Re: only word - 03/12/01 03:46 PM
Yes.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: only word - 03/12/01 05:38 PM
questions like that *do make me grumpy

tsuwm, you are the only person i've seen use an asterisk to denote bold text without 'closing' the word. at first it thought was a typo, but you do it often. i note that later in your post you type "*right*". i'm curious: is there a difference? where did your style of a single apostrophe originate? the only other form i've seen is to _underline_ the word to be stressed.

TIA
b4

Posted By: tsuwm Re: only word - 03/12/01 06:13 PM
b666,

maybe it's my own style, but * is for *emphasis and *x* is for *stress*!

Posted By: Max Quordlepleen Re: only word - 03/12/01 06:43 PM
How about a double U?

Why, where, when, wherefore, who, whom, whence. (MaxQ doing his bit to lower the standard of puns still further.)


Posted By: of troy Re: only word - 03/12/01 06:54 PM
continuum

and tsuwm-- you had some more?



Posted By: Faldage Re: only word - 03/12/01 07:08 PM
tsuwm explains *x* is for *stress*

Or wild cards, which Merriam Webster on line accepts giving us, among others, muumuu and squush, which latter sounds like a recent addition but dates from 1837.

Posted By: tsuwm Re: only word - 03/12/01 07:18 PM
duumvirate - government or control by two people
weltanschauung - a particular philosophy or view of life (borrowed from German)

but you've got the most common ones (unless you want to count muu-muu ;)

---
oh, here's one that's cuute but won't win uu any spelling bees: squuncke - obs. form of skunk
Posted By: Anonymous Re: only word - 03/12/01 11:07 PM
b666

um, tsuwm... your other permutations of my name have been amusing, if not endearing, but unless there's some alternative association for "666", i really must take umbrage. sheeeeesh!!

Posted By: tsuwm Re: only word - 03/12/01 11:20 PM
bdevil,

you're right; I hereby forswear the use of numerals altogether.

Posted By: wwh Re: only word - 03/13/01 12:51 AM
Numbers can get bad reputations. A couple Hispanic students took umbrage when a lecturer said that in South America, the number 606 on a sign outside a shop meant that it was a pharmacy. That was the number that Paul Ehrlich gave to salvarsan, the first really effective cure for syphilis.
There is an interesting story that goes with that. A woman who had been secretary to Paul Ehrlich wrote a book, in which she said Paul Ehrlich had thought 606 was worthless. But against his will, he had been obliged to give laboratory space to a Japanese graduate student who had managed to infect rabbits with syphilis. Paul Ehrlich, just to make busy work for the Japanese student, set him to testing all the compounds that had been found useless. When the Japanese student found 606 would cure syphilis in rabbits, Paul Erhlich shouted "I knew it all the time!" And made sure the Japanes student got no credit at all.

Posted By: Capital Kiwi Re: only word - 03/13/01 08:59 AM
you're right; I hereby forswear the use of numerals altogether.

tsuwm, does this mean we can count you out in the future?

Posted By: wsieber Re: only word - 03/13/01 11:12 AM
. A woman who had been secretary to Paul Ehrlich wrote a book

Hi William,
Would that be an early case of whistleblowing? Have you got the reference of that book?


Posted By: storkie1 Re: only word - 03/13/01 12:43 PM
Oh boy!! Is my face red!! Thank you,twusm, for the additions but nobody got the the one I had in mind, which is a sports term for the rest periods in "common" English(american, Indian or whatever).

The word is CHUKKER!!!!!!!!

Posted By: maverick Re: only word - 03/13/01 01:04 PM
The word is CHUKKER!!!!!!!!

Don't be red-faced too long: "the only stupid question is the one we never asked". Now I had thought this was spelled chukkar, but on having LIU find you have given me the lesson of a new variant, so thanks!

Posted By: wwh Re: only word - 03/13/01 02:45 PM
Dear Maverick: Did you ever play a pukka chukker wearing chukkas?

Posted By: Sparteye hmmmm - 03/13/01 05:16 PM
"a Japanese graduate student who had managed to infect rabbits with syphilis."

Dr Bill, I'm still thinking about this one...

Posted By: wwh Re: hmmmm - 03/13/01 05:30 PM
The Japanese graduate student in question was a genuine scientific pioneer, wrongfully denied the credit he deserved. And surely you are not hinting that bestiality with a rabbit is possible? A medical missionary to what is now Vietnam warned us not to eat duck over there, as the cooks routinely copulate with the abominable cavity thereof. But he never mentioned rabbits in that connection.(sic, again.)

Posted By: of troy Re: hmmmm - 03/13/01 05:45 PM
reminds me-- what is the difference between a feather and chicken?

with a feather is kinky-- but with a chicken is down right perverted!

Posted By: BlanchePatch Re: only word - 03/15/01 12:20 PM
I have two really useful [ahem] ones in my wwftd list.

What's wwftd?

Posted By: shanks Re: only word - 03/15/01 01:55 PM
wwwftd = worthless word for the day
A list that tsuwm provides.

cheer

the sunshine warrior

Posted By: tsuwm Re: only word - 03/15/01 02:24 PM
shanks attempt to define wwwftd [sic]

woefully worthless word...?
weally worthless word...??


Posted By: maverick Re: only word - 03/15/01 04:14 PM
wwwftd [sic]

... but is there a cure?

Posted By: shanks Re: only word - 03/16/01 09:45 AM
wwwftd [sic]

... but is there a cure?


Why Would We Feel The Desire?
Oh, I'm il, I'm il (sic?)
I need a glass of good (propter?) hoc!

The lunatix have taken over the asylum...

Posted By: Geoff Re: only word - 03/17/01 10:31 PM
... but is there a cure?

For syphilis? If one took 606, and it worked, did one become syphilless?

BTW, the spell checker wants me to substitute Syacuse for syphilis. Any correlation?

Posted By: AnnaStrophic Re: only word - 03/18/01 01:26 PM
If Anu and tsuwm are *really one and the same, would their combined offerings then be www.fat_dad?

© Wordsmith.org