the worthless word for the day is: hominist
someone who advocates equal rights for men
coined by G.B. Shaw in the preface to "Man and Superman" (1903)
In reply to:Actually, my first mental leap was picturing a rabid murderer of males only...
cf. wife
In reply to:Virist for the male version of feminist
This might mean that the proper study of virists is virology, but that make problems, since we already have viruses (viri?) to complicate things.
In reply to:viruses (viri?)
We've already been innoculated against this particular problem:
http://wordsmith.org/board/showflat.pl?Cat=&Board=words&Number=3863&page=&view=&sb=&vc=1
Bingley
In reply to:worthless anyday in MHO, are words like
Hostess (why not just host?)
waitress ( ~waiter or server)
aviatrix ( ~aviator/pilot/flyer)
actress (~actor/performer)
stewardess ( ~steward/attendant)
Which brings me back to a question I asked earlier. If you object to gender based distinctions, why do you yourself make a distinction between a milliner and a hatter? The difference you note is gender-based. You said that the only difference between a milliner and a hatter was the gender of the person for whom the hat was being made. Isn't that just as arbitrary a distinction as any of those listed above? I'm not a mother yet, but it struck me while reading your list that mother and father should both be eliminated, if your rule is applied. We have a non-gender specific alternative, parent. Would you say, "Don't call me a mother, I'm a parent?"