Wordsmith.org
Posted By: tsuwm yet another really dumb question - 12/28/01 05:38 PM
why don't we go back to giving new threads subject lines that relate somewhat to the subject contained therein? while we all know that the subject will quickly morph, at least there is then some clue as to which thread is which - unlike the current situation with several threads.

thank you for your kind attention,
-the nonManagement

Posted By: AnnaStrophic Re: yet another really dumb question - 12/28/01 05:58 PM
hear, hear.

Posted By: Wordwind Re: yet another really dumb question - 12/28/01 09:10 PM
Sheesh, you left-brained people! We must have with this orderly universe, huh?

And where in Sam's Hill is the word to discuss here?

Oh, I know. Let's check out Mr. Fischer's Lexicon for something there on disorder....Bingo! Here's an appropriate one of many (I'm sure):

eccentricate
to go out of one's proper sphere [obs]


This thread is about the ethics of to eccentricate or not to eccentricate. Thanks a lot, tsuwm! Something new to chew on.

Best regards,
WhirlingWorld

Posted By: wwh Re: excentricate - 12/28/01 09:19 PM
If all the excentricated left the board, would anybody be left?

Posted By: milum Re: yet another really dumb question - 12/28/01 11:48 PM

Who breaks the thread, the one who holds on, or the one who pulls?

Milum


Posted By: tsuwm Re: yet another really dumb question - 12/29/01 12:40 AM
>We must have with this orderly universe, huh?

     NO SMOKING
NO SPITTING




-THE MGT.

Posted By: Wordwind Re: yet another really dumb question - 12/29/01 12:50 AM
To: Mgt.
From: Lackey
Re:>We must have with this orderly universe, huh?
Date: Can't find my calendar


I meant "have it out," but was having an ADD moment. Seriously.


© Wordsmith.org