Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
#160204 06/05/06 11:36 AM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1
S
sdarr Offline OP
stranger
OP Offline
stranger
S
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1
Years ago, a grammar school riddles asked "which is the longest word?".

The answer was "smiles", since it has a mile between the s's.


Steve Darr
#160205 06/05/06 12:42 PM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1
M
stranger
Offline
stranger
M
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1
What about "disestablishmentarianism"?

#160206 06/05/06 12:51 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210
pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis

welcome, folks!

you might like this page, too: longest words

I've had some fun exploring the old threads on this topic. there are a few!

Last edited by etaoin; 06/05/06 12:55 PM.

formerly known as etaoin...
#160207 06/05/06 01:15 PM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3
H
stranger
Offline
stranger
H
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3
as I understand it, i18n is the abbreviation for internationalization, and L10n is the abbreviation for localization (preferentially not l10n - the lower case L is ambiguous in many fonts). The 18 and 10 stand for the number of letters omitted. I have to say this is the laziest and least informative way to abbreviate a term I have ever encountered. I suspect it is not so much an abbreviation as a shibboleth.

#160208 06/05/06 01:26 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
I suspect it is not so much an abbreviation as a shibboleth.

Why? Both of the words are long and commonly used, at least in the IT industry in which I work. And the abbrviations are easy to remember and use. You can look them up online if you're unfamiliar with them. They've been around for at least a decade. Many outsiders see jargons or dialects as intentionally obfuscating, but for the people who use them, they are not in the least.


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
#160209 06/05/06 01:34 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
its easy enough to program a word processor program to "auto correct" I18nand put down internationalization (so 4 keystrokes will produce a 20 letter word in the text.) just as most WPP will auto correct teh and replace it with the.

(this offers users the writer the advantage of using shorthand, and readers easy understanding what is being talked about.)

#160210 06/05/06 01:34 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,819
A
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
A
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,819
Quote:

I have to say this is the laziest and least informative way to abbreviate a term I have ever encountered. I suspect it is not so much an abbreviation as a shibboleth.




I had to look up shibboleth, an act which may or may not have involved irony. Anyway, I think the terms L10n and i18n are jargon, not meant to be informative abbreviations at all. I suspect that in situations where internationalization and localization are issues, employees have to use the words frequently in office memos. They get tired of typing the word out, so they invented i18n as a stand-in.

If they use Microsoft Word, and I'm sure many do, they could easily have MSW type it out for them. Just as MSW can auto-correct common types like the dreaded "teh," it can be made to auto "corect" short hand words into longer ones. I use this feature extensively, so that when typing on my home or office computer I can type stuff like "a/w" and it gets changed to "associated with" in the blink of an eye.

#160211 06/05/06 01:58 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
I do not use a word processor to write emails, I use a mail client. My audience knows what i18n and L10n mean, and to them they are not obscure. The other place I see the abbreviations extensively used is on whiteboards. If I were writing a manual for general consumption, I would type out the full words.


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
#160212 06/05/06 02:55 PM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3
H
stranger
Offline
stranger
H
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3
Ok, my point was overstated. I just was struck by the novel (to me) mechanics of forming an abbreviation by listing the number of omitted letters. It seems so arbitrary. The number itself doesn't convey any information. It just seems odd. I know every specialized field needs its own technical vocabulary, and nobody likes to type. The IT field is full of clever or punning acronyms like TWAIN (which may or may not stand for "technology without an interesting name"), pronounceable (GUI, BASIC, DOS, WYSIWYG), self-referential ("TLA" = three-letter acronym) or even recursive ,like GNU ("GNU's not UNIX"). "Unix" itself was originally a geek pun on "Multics". Seems like someone could have done better for L10n and i18n. No matter, if people know what it means. "IT" stands for "ivory Tower", right? (kidding!)

Auto-correction is very handy for pranks. Years ago, we configured a colleague's copy of MS Word, so that when he wrote his name formally (e.g "Jonathan, Q. Smith, P.E.") MS Word would auto-"correct" it to

"Jonathan, Q. ("I'm not wearing any pants") Smith, P.E.".

It took about a week for him to trigger it and he was absolutely dumfounded.

#160213 06/05/06 03:10 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 456
addict
Offline
addict
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 456
It is gratifying to know what the numbers mean in those terms. Both are at least far more palatable that exceedingly annoying lazy-typing fragments like "Pls" and "ur" [just a cynical opinion].


ÅΓª╥┐↕§
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,912
Posts229,283
Members9,179
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV, Heather_Turey, Standy
9,179 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 442 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
tsuwm 10,542
wofahulicodoc 10,510
LukeJavan8 9,916
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5