|
|
|
Miscellany
|
|
Re: Maquillage thought for today author hidden in the dark?
by
tsuwm
Today at 03:00 PM
Originally Posted By: OwlbowHello & welcome
Try this to start
my quote of your link makes four(4) links to the same page in this thread! (littleword's first link is one, littleword's second link has the second..)<
|
|
|
Information and announcements
|
|
|
Re: For the Love of God
by
BranShea
Today at 01:21 PM
>< Perhaps an artist will find subject matter in Hirst' conduct.
Hmm.. ? I'm not sure I understand you very well.
|
|
|
Miscellany
|
|
|
Miscellany
|
|
|
Miscellany
|
|
|
Maquillage thought for today author hidden in the dark?
by
littleword
Today at 11:57 AM
Hi there! Sorry to bother you with my sherlockian musings, but it seems the author of today's quote "Poets are soldiers that liberate words from the steadfast possession of definition. -Eli Khamarov", doesn't seem to exist. After finding this Eli K
|
|
|
Information and announcements
|
|
|
Re: For the Love of God
by
morphememedley
Today at 11:10 AM
From the linked article:
Quote:The human skull used as the base for the work, bought in a shop in Islington, is thought to be that of a European living between 1720 and 1810. …
Perhaps an artist will find subject matter in H
|
|
|
Information and announcements
|
|
|
Re: For the Love of God
by
BranShea
Today at 10:27 AM
Originally Posted By: ZedAnd after all that it isn't even bad art. It's only a cheap copy an expensive copy of someone else's work which makes it just bad plagiarism.
I agree with his mother. Your aswers are always comforting. As furt
|
|
|
Q&A about words
|
|
|
Q&A about words
|
|
|
Q&A about words
|
|
|
Q&A about words
|
|
|
Information and announcements
|
|
|
Re: For the Love of God
by
Zed
Today at 03:32 AM
And after all that it isn't even bad art. It's only a cheap copy an expensive copy of someone else's work which makes it just bad plagiarism.
I agree with his mother.
|
|
|
Q&A about words
|
|
|
Q&A about words
|
|
|
Re: Abstract term for puck, ball and shuttlecock?
by
Jeremy Murphy
Yesterday at 10:43 PM
Originally Posted By: TheFallibleFiend
JM: 'Words like missile and projectile are too broad'
They're too specific.
Well, yes, that too, it cuts both ways.
Originally Posted By: TheFallibleFiendJM: 'So a word t
|
|
|
Information and announcements
|
|
|
Re: For the Love of God
by
BranShea
Yesterday at 02:23 PM
Goedenavond Aramis. I hope it will not make you drop out forever.
I guess, it is not so much the fact that it is hideous, but somehow the fact that it is hiding the beauty of the bare skull,
if ye know what I mean. ( I know it's caste
|
|
|
Words and languages in schools
|
|
|
Re: Who is Michael Carr?
by
TheFallibleFiend
Yesterday at 01:41 PM
If the suggested connection to a principal in Northern Virginia is the correct one, it is interesting to note that there may well have been a significant political purpose to the message.
There is a strong push in the state of Virginia and
|
|
|
Words and languages in schools
|
|
|
Re: Who is Michael Carr?
by
TheFallibleFiend
Yesterday at 12:50 PM
Originally Posted By: tsuwmor it could be this one:
Michael Carr, spokesman for the National Association of Secondary School Principals in Reston, Va.
That seems likely. It sounds a lot like quotes used by others in tha
|
|
|
Information and announcements
|
|
|
Re: For the Love of God
by
Aramis
Yesterday at 11:31 AM
Goede Dag Branny.
Have to agree that is hideous. What a thing to drop in on after a long time away.
|
|
|
Information and announcements
|
|
Re: For the Love of God
by
Owlbow
Yesterday at 09:55 AM
I think that it should be exhibited, "walking" a bejeweled skeletal poodle to make it even more gauche.
|
|
|
Q&A about words
|
|
|
Re: Abstract term for puck, ball and shuttlecock?
by
TheFallibleFiend
Yesterday at 09:05 AM
F: "Only problem I see with manipulandum is no one would know what you mean."
I agree with Faldage. The word is too obscure.
JM: 'Words like missile and projectile are too broad'
They're too specific.
JM: 'So
|
|
|
Information and announcements
|
|
|
For the Love of God
by
BranShea
Yesterday at 08:40 AM
For the Love of God
Damian Hirst
Tooth grinding primeur coming up in the Amsterdam Rijksmuseum.
And they are proud to present.
One of the fading Dutch Popes of modern Art Rudi Fuchs speaks in superlative terms about
|
|
|
Miscellany
|
|
|
Re: The rare monarch may be a genius.
by
BranShea
Yesterday at 07:50 AM
Interesting , but quite a long and not too easy read.
Structuralist and poststructuralist French philosophy
has put a heavy mark on postmodern and actual visual arts. Making it all so often unnecessarily obscure.
On colors:
|
|
|
Q&A about words
|
|
|
Re: Abstract term for puck, ball and shuttlecock?
by
Faldage
Yesterday at 06:31 AM
Only problem I see with manipulandum is no one would know what you mean. Counter would work for, maybe, something like a backgammon piece or a Monopoly piece, something that marks your progress in a game where you proceed around a game board.
<
|
|
|
Q&A about words
|
|
|
Re: Abstract term for puck, ball and shuttlecock?
by
Jeremy Murphy
Yesterday at 03:06 AM
Originally Posted By: The PookDo you really mean abstract? It seems to me you mean something more like generic. There is nothing 'abstract' about any of these missiles, especially if they hit you at speed. They are all concrete objects.
|
|
|
Q&A about words
|
|
|
Re: Abstract term for puck, ball and shuttlecock?
by
The Pook
08/26/08 10:09 PM
Do you really mean abstract? It seems to me you mean something more like generic. There is nothing 'abstract' about any of these missiles, especially if they hit you at speed. They are all concrete objects.
How about one of these?
|
|
Search FAQ