Wordsmith Talk |
About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us | |||
You are not logged in. [Log In] Wordsmith Talk » Forums » Active Topics Past 24 hours Register User Forum List Calendar Active Topics Search FAQ
Active Topics | Active Posts Past 24 hours | Past 48 hours | Past 7 days Forum Subject Miscellany
![]()
Re: Maquillage thought for today author hidden in the dark? by tsuwm Today at 03:00 PM
Originally Posted By: OwlbowHello & welcome
Try this to start
my quote of your link makes four(4) links to the same page in this thread! (littleword's first link is one, littleword's second link has the second..)<Information and announcements
![]()
Re: For the Love of God by BranShea Today at 01:21 PM
>< Perhaps an artist will find subject matter in Hirst' conduct.
Hmm.. ? I'm not sure I understand you very well.Miscellany
![]()
Re: Maquillage thought for today author hidden in the dark? by BranShea Today at 12:49 PM
Lycos-Khamarov
Got this one via Dutch page, very obscure entries , must be a fictional person.
various connections
I did not really check them all.
this today's quote: quote doubtful site. Back to work.Miscellany
![]()
Re: Maquillage thought for today author hidden in the dark? by Owlbow Today at 12:32 PM
Hello & welcome
Try this to startMiscellany
![]()
Maquillage thought for today author hidden in the dark? by littleword Today at 11:57 AM
Hi there! Sorry to bother you with my sherlockian musings, but it seems the author of today's quote "Poets are soldiers that liberate words from the steadfast possession of definition. -Eli Khamarov", doesn't seem to exist. After finding this Eli KInformation and announcements
![]()
Re: For the Love of God by morphememedley Today at 11:10 AM
From the linked article:
Quote:The human skull used as the base for the work, bought in a shop in Islington, is thought to be that of a European living between 1720 and 1810. …
Perhaps an artist will find subject matter in HInformation and announcements
![]()
Re: For the Love of God by BranShea Today at 10:27 AM
Originally Posted By: ZedAnd after all that it isn't even bad art. It's only a cheap copy an expensive copy of someone else's work which makes it just bad plagiarism.
I agree with his mother. Your aswers are always comforting. As furtQ&A about words
![]()
Re: Paul Revere types by wow Today at 09:58 AM
Ask him !?!?!?Q&A about words
![]()
Re: Abstract term for puck, ball and shuttlecock? by BranShea Today at 08:39 AM
I side with thingy, but if that's too broad I propose: ips
(to boldly propose what no one proposed before)Q&A about words
![]()
Re: Abstract term for puck, ball and shuttlecock? by Faldage Today at 06:06 AM
Originally Posted By: Zedthingy??
Way too broad.Q&A about words
![]()
Re: Abstract term for puck, ball and shuttlecock? by Zed Today at 03:34 AM
thingy??Information and announcements
![]()
Re: For the Love of God by Zed Today at 03:32 AM
And after all that it isn't even bad art. It's only a cheap copy an expensive copy of someone else's work which makes it just bad plagiarism.
I agree with his mother.Q&A about words
![]()
Re: Abstract term for puck, ball and shuttlecock? by The Pook Yesterday at 11:37 PM
Yes that is much more clear. But it doesn't help. I don't think there is such a word. Not in English at least.Q&A about words
![]()
Re: Abstract term for puck, ball and shuttlecock? by Jeremy Murphy Yesterday at 10:43 PM
Originally Posted By: TheFallibleFiend
JM: 'Words like missile and projectile are too broad'
They're too specific.
Well, yes, that too, it cuts both ways.
Originally Posted By: TheFallibleFiendJM: 'So a word t
Page 1 of 1 1
Forum Stats 6628 Members
16 Forums
12170 Topics
178698 Posts
Max Online: 853 @ 10/23/07 11:39 AM
Who's Online 2 registered (latishya, 1 invisible) and 15 anonymous users online.
Newest Members ashish_kumar, chis, Notamythologist, parkar1234, Jeremy Murphy
6627 Registered Users
Top Posters 13858wwh
11591Faldage
9643Jackie
8730tsuwm
6417AnnaStrophic
6296Wordwind
6097etaoin
5393of troy
4683maverick
4186WhitmanO'Neill
August Su M Tu W Th F Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
My Cookies · Mark all read Powered by UBB.threads™ Contact Us · Wordsmith Talk · Top
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.
Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat© 2008 Wordsmith.org